China is Likely to Overtake the U.S. in Scientific Research

Alex B. Berezow

  • Article
  • February 01, 2010

The writing is on the wall.  China will overtake the U.S. in scientific output in the near future.  A couple reports make this conclusion almost inevitable. First, a recent post on the blog of the internationally renowned journal Science indicates the rise of China in scientific productivity.  For instance, China ranks second only to the U.S. in number of journal publications.  Also, China is increasing its investment in science education and research.  Additionally, for many scientific indicators, "the slope of the line is accelerating rather than decelerating." Secondly, American education is mediocre at best.  In a 2006 study of  several different countries and economic areas conducted by the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), U.S. students consistently ranked "below average" for proficiency in math and science.  The U.S. ranked 18th in science and 24th in math out of 30 (OECD) countries.  In math, the U.S. was not only outperformed by Japan and Germany, but it was also (embarrassingly) outperformed by former communist countries such as Hungary, Poland, and Czech Republic.  When economic areas (such as Taipei or Hong Kong) were included, the U.S. fared even worse.  (The 56-page executive summary can be found here.) Finally, it should be pointed out that countries that outperformed the U.S. in education often spent less money on it.  For instance, as a percentage of GDP, the U.S. (5.7%) outspent Poland (5.6%), Hungary (5.5%), Germany (4.6%), and Japan (3.6%). What does it all mean?  It's pretty straightforward:  With U.S. students falling behind much of the westernized world in math and science proficiency, it is only a matter of time before China will overtake us as the global leader in science and technology.  However, this could probably be prevented if we fix our decidedly mediocre K-12 education system. Reforming the quality of our education is the key to the solution.  Throwing more money at the problem is certainly not.

  • Share

Most Commented

January 24, 2024

1.

After Claudine

The idea has caught on that the radical left overplayed its hand in DEI and is now vulnerable to those of us who seek major reforms. This is not, however, the first time that the a......

February 13, 2024

2.

The Great Academic Divorce with China

All signs show that American education is beginning a long and painful divorce with the People’s Republic of China. But will academia go through with it?...

October 31, 2023

3.

University of Washington Violated Non-Discrimination Policy, Internal Report Finds

A faculty hiring committee at the University of Washington “inappropriately considered candidates’ races when determining the order of offers,” provided “disparate op......

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

July 8, 2011

3.

Ask a Scholar: What Is Structural-Functionalism, Conflict Theory and Symbolic Interactionism?

Professor Jonathan Imber clarifies concepts of sociologocal theory....