Articles and Archives
Most recent posting below. See other articles in the column to the right.
Anger, Sedition, and Freedom of Speech
As noted yesterday, NAS president Peter Wood was interviewed briefly on MSNBC in a segment focusing on public anger and the potential for acts of anti-government violence. 
Wood was asked in connection with his book A Bee in the Mouth: Anger in America Now (2006). In his book, Wood argues that
In Wood’s view new anger has roots in
New anger is clearly an element in contemporary higher education as well. Although most colleges and universities these days outwardly reject the idea that they are responsible for shaping the character of their students, they do in fact strongly encourage students to embrace the assumptions of expressive individualism. As the NAS has pointed out, numerous student life programs aim to “educate” students to become a certain kind of “citizen.” Typically this New Citizen has been liberated from traditional moral values, which are characterized as a tissue of “prejudices,” and has acquired instead a generalized anger towards
MSNBC’s interest in interviewing Wood comes as part of the political controversy that swelled following the passage of the health care reform bill. Protest against the bill by “Tea Party” activists has been countered with claims by the bill’s supporters that the protesters’ anger amounts to “hate speech.” Yesterday former President Clinton warned that the anger of the protesters could well incite some individuals to acts of mayhem. Yesterday marked 
the fifteenth anniversary of the bombing of the
In his book and in the interview, Wood argued that there is no necessary link between new anger and acts of violence. Wood regards new anger as corrosive to our civic discourse but sees it more as a flamboyant form of self-gratification than as an inducement to destructive acts.
What role should responsible scholars play in the debate over the limits of free expression? In an article in the American Spectator, NAS member and legal historian Dr. Craig Klafter casts his eye back to the 1798 Sedition Act—an earlier episode in American history in which a governing party attempted to suppress dissent in the name of protecting public order. We wonder whether other NAS members have published insights into this troubled confluence of heated emotion, excited political rhetoric, and freedom of speech.
Add a Comment
RSS Feed 
del.icio.us 
Digg this 
Share on Facebook
