Continuing the Debate Over Admissions Preferences

Dec 02, 2011 | 

George Leef

Font Size  

  

Continuing the Debate Over Admissions Preferences

Dec 02, 2011 | 

George Leef



In today's Pope Center piece, Notre Dame philosophy professor James Sterba gives his counter-arguments to the case I made against enshrining "socio-economic diversity" as another goal for elite colleges to attain through admissions preferences. We both participated in a forum back in September at Pomona College where that was the topic. I presented my case against that in a piece we published in October.  Professor Sterba responds and I respond to him.

I remain convinced that "affirmative action" -- whether to achieve "better racial balance" or to get more students from poorer families into top schools, has minimal and mostly imaginary benefits that come at substantial cost.

There are no comments for this article yet.