Editors' Note

Carol Iannone

The Winter 2021 issue carries a review by R. Lawrence Purdy of A Dubious Expediency; How Race Preferences Damage Higher Education, edited by Gail Heriot and Maimon Schwarzschild. In addressing the lead essay by John Ellis, “Starting down the Slippery Slope,” Purdy equates “affirmative action” and “race preferences,” and portrays Ellis's former support for one as the same as support for the other. But in his essay, Ellis asserts that at UCSC in 1977 he understood affirmative action as “outreach” to recruit more blacks, Hispanics, and women into the applicant pool—a pursuit sharply distinct from race preferences in admission.

“Our job was to look diligently for potential minority and female graduate students in places and in ways we might not have before, and to motivate them to apply,” Ellis writes, “but that was the end of the matter. They would sink or swim on their own merits in the application process.”

Soon, however, the pressure increased to admit more of these applicants, even if their credentials did not meet the generally expected standards, with the result that many dropped out of the program. What had originally been intended as “good” affirmative action turned into explicitly admitting women and minorities through group preference.

Ellis concludes that “there is no such thing” as “good” affirmative action, since even in “modest, outreach-only” form, it represents a departure from the “principle” of “equal consideration” of all students at every stage.

We regret that our review blurred this distinction and we apologize to Professor Ellis.

  • Share
Most Commented

February 28, 2024

1.

The Dystopian World of Social Work Education

A social work insider explains that social justice doctrine, Critical Race Theory, and the attendant collapse of academic standards has become even more widely and deeply entrenched within s......

April 24, 2024

2.

Heterodox Thinking on Evolution and Radical Enlightenment

Between the Modern Synthesis—which says that evolution is driven by accidental genetic changes—and its heterodox challenges—which argue for various forms of agency and non-......

April 24, 2024

3.

Evolution Is Neither Random Accidents nor Divine Intervention: Biological Action Changes Genomes

Biologist James A. Shapiro believes the discovery of different biological means by which organisms can alter their genomes, along with the process of interspecific hybridization, demands a r......

Most Read

April 24, 2024

1.

Country Music Violates the “Sacred Project” of Elites

Sociologist Jukka Savolainen contrasts the media’s vicious treatment of country singers Jason Aldean and Oliver Anthony to the far more benign, or even laudatory, treatment of lawbreak......

May 30, 2018

2.

The Case for Colonialism

From the summer issue of Academic Questions, we reprint the controversial article, "The Case for Colonialism." ...

July 2, 2020

3.

In Humans, Sex is Binary and Immutable

The idea that there are more than two sexes in human beings is a rejection of everything biological science has taught us. Unbelievably, this idea is coming directly from within the highest......