Editors' Note

Carol Iannone

The Winter 2021 issue carries a review by R. Lawrence Purdy of A Dubious Expediency; How Race Preferences Damage Higher Education, edited by Gail Heriot and Maimon Schwarzschild. In addressing the lead essay by John Ellis, “Starting down the Slippery Slope,” Purdy equates “affirmative action” and “race preferences,” and portrays Ellis's former support for one as the same as support for the other. But in his essay, Ellis asserts that at UCSC in 1977 he understood affirmative action as “outreach” to recruit more blacks, Hispanics, and women into the applicant pool—a pursuit sharply distinct from race preferences in admission.

“Our job was to look diligently for potential minority and female graduate students in places and in ways we might not have before, and to motivate them to apply,” Ellis writes, “but that was the end of the matter. They would sink or swim on their own merits in the application process.”

Soon, however, the pressure increased to admit more of these applicants, even if their credentials did not meet the generally expected standards, with the result that many dropped out of the program. What had originally been intended as “good” affirmative action turned into explicitly admitting women and minorities through group preference.

Ellis concludes that “there is no such thing” as “good” affirmative action, since even in “modest, outreach-only” form, it represents a departure from the “principle” of “equal consideration” of all students at every stage.

We regret that our review blurred this distinction and we apologize to Professor Ellis.

  • Share
Most Commented

March 18, 2022

1.

The Case for Colonialism: A Response to My Critics

Political scientist and NAS board member Bruce Gilley’s article “The Case for Colonialism” (republished in Academic Questions in the summer of 2018), has been the subject o......

July 22, 2022

2.

Code Red for the Arts

An absorbing and bittersweet film from the 1990s speaks to tyranny’s hatred of the arts, the timelessness of great music, the universality of beauty, and the lie of “cultural app......

July 22, 2022

3.

What, After Speech Is Free, Shall We Say?

The over-specialization of academic disciplines, the decline of core curricula, deference to student sentiment, administrative overreach, and restrictions on speech have erased the universit......

Most Read

May 30, 2018

1.

The Case for Colonialism

From the summer issue of Academic Questions, we reprint the controversial article, "The Case for Colonialism." ...

July 2, 2020

2.

In Humans, Sex is Binary and Immutable

The idea that there are more than two sexes in human beings is a rejection of everything biological science has taught us. Unbelievably, this idea is coming directly from within the highest......

March 18, 2022

3.

The Case for Colonialism: A Response to My Critics

Political scientist and NAS board member Bruce Gilley’s article “The Case for Colonialism” (republished in Academic Questions in the summer of 2018), has been the subject o......