Ashley Thorne Defends the Need to Challenge Students

National Association of Scholars

The Chronicle of Higher Education published an essay by Ashley Thorne titled "Students Will Rise When Colleges Challenge Them to Read Good Books" on March 13, 2016. Thorne quoted John Gardner, who penned a response titled "On Providing Learning Support for the Students You Actually Have" in the Chronicle. Thorne responds to Gardner's commentary below:

In his March 28 essay responding to my article “Students Will Rise When Colleges Challenge Them to Read Good Books,” John N. Gardner writes that I have quoted him out of context and focused too much on challenging students rather than supporting them. As he notes, I did confirm the quote with him – “Plan for the students you actually have, not those you wish you had, or think you used to have, or think you used to be like.” He complains that I did not quote him at more length and that I equated his comment with low expectations. I wrote, “In other words, be realistic; don’t expect too much of students.”

My essay in no way distorted what Dr. Gardner said. He argues that we need to both “challenge and support” students. Who would disagree? Challenging students isn’t enough on its own, and I wrote that the burden falls to colleges to show students why good books are worth reading and help them set their sights higher.

But the leaders of the “first-year experience” movement can’t show that colleges are challenging students. The evidence is clear. NAS’s reports on common reading programs (https://www.nas.org/beachbooks...show that year after year colleges assign very recent books as their introduction to college reading. Most of the titles written at a junior-high reading level (that’s not my assessment but that of the Lexile independent ratings - see http://thefederalist.com/2016/.... So when Dr. Gardner praises the colleges for using “high-impact practices” such as common reading, I’m not impressed.

Perhaps he is right that we might complement one another’s efforts. The NAS can focus on the “challenge” side of things, and he and other first-year teachers can work on the “support” side. Right now, however, it’s clear that the challenge is no more than empty rhetoric. To serve students better, it’s time to assign good books that require students to stretch, at least a little.

  • Share

Most Commented

July 16, 2020

1.

An Emeritus Professor Under Siege Once Again

The case of Stuart Hurlbert is a grim reminder that not even emeritus professors are safe from the continual onslaught of heterodox views by higher ed censors....

June 15, 2020

2.

See Clearly, Decide Wisely, Act Justly

An Open Letter to the Converse College Community in response to its administrative decisions relating to diversity and inclusion on campus. ...

July 28, 2020

3.

Exclusive: UT Austin Proposes Political Litmus Tests for Hiring and Promotion

The University of Texas at Austin has proposed the “Faculty Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, Strategic Plan," exchanging merit-based success for identity-based dive...

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

July 28, 2020

2.

Exclusive: UT Austin Proposes Political Litmus Tests for Hiring and Promotion

The University of Texas at Austin has proposed the “Faculty Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, Strategic Plan," exchanging merit-based success for identity-based dive...

July 16, 2020

3.

An Emeritus Professor Under Siege Once Again

The case of Stuart Hurlbert is a grim reminder that not even emeritus professors are safe from the continual onslaught of heterodox views by higher ed censors....