Coronavirus and Reproducibility

David Randall

Thinking about scientific reproducibility helps us to think about the coronavirus.

The eminent reproducibility expert John Ioannidis, who in 2005 crystallized scientific awareness of the reproducibility crisis, has just written “A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data”—an article that queries whether we are making vast, economy- and society-wrecking decisions on what amounts to a false positive—insufficient data, badly analyzed, about infection rates and mortality. Ioannidis is generalizing his experience of the last decades of biomedical research, where the argument has always been:

This is an emergency, we need to act or people will die, we must immediately use this partially tested serum—oops, guess we wasted $10 billion on a placebo.

Ioannidis is afraid that we are about to jump off a cliff on the basis of insufficient data, and with no clear idea of the landscape below.

This is all true. And the news today is that there are 3,405 dead in Italy, and counting. The arguments in favor of acting now, with insufficient data, are unusually strong.

Right now, the most important thing we can do as citizens is to keep questions of reproducibility in mind—to be a little skeptical of the latest headline, to ask can this data be reproduced, is the statistical analysis appropriate, are the journalists chasing after an exciting false positive? Instant credulity of the latest headlines is no more appropriate now than at any other time.

On the other hand, as the old saw says, If you can keep your head while all about you are losing theirs, you probably don’t know what’s going on. The Greeks tell us to prefer moderation to either extreme: we should seek the middle road between panic and stubborn inertia.

In the longer run, Americans, rightly, are already beginning to think about what policy is appropriate for the medium and long term—How do we contain recurrence of the coronavirus? How do we prepare for the next pandemic? Unfortunately, we are likely to hard-wire policy now, based on our insufficient data and possibly faulty analyses. Ioannidis’ caution, which asks for transparent science and reproducibility before we act, is entirely appropriate as we consider what spending decisions, laws, and regulations to undertake. Every lawmaker, legislative assistant, administrator, and federally employed scientific expert should read Ioannidis’ article, and keep his cautions in mind.

And every professor, every teacher, should be on the alert against the descent of a new political correctness and groupthink about the coronavirus, about epidemiology, about appropriate public policy. We should expect some new intolerance, aimed at coronavirus denialists, probably allied with a fanatical insistence to use politically correct language about the Wuhan coronavirus. Higher education’s default, alas, is now for intolerant groupthink. If allowed to extend to discussion of the science of the coronavirus, it may have immediately deadly consequences.

We must be prepared now to champion open discussion about the science of the coronavirus, and about all related public policy.

Photo by CDC on Unsplash

  • Share

Most Commented

January 9, 2023


NAS Celebrates the Nomination of Reform-Minded Trustees to the New College of Florida Board

The National Association of Scholars is delighted with Governor Ron DeSantis’ nomination of six education reformers to the Board of Trustees of the New College of Florida....

December 7, 2022


New Study Tracks Rise of DEI in STEM Departments, Associations, Grants, and Literature

A new study published today by the National Association of Scholars, Ideological Intensification, offers an in-depth quantitative analysis of just how far DEI has advanced into STEM fields....

January 5, 2023


NAS Condemns the Attacks against Jordan Peterson

The National Association of Scholars condemns the unrelenting illiberal attacks being levied against Dr. Peterson and against anyone who dares push back against the enemies of intellectual f......

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

March 22, 2023


How Many Confucius Institutes Are in the United States?

UPDATED: We're keeping track of all Confucius Institutes in the United States, including those that remain open, those that closed, and those that have announced their closing....