Editor Accused of Libel Wins in Paris Court: Victory for Academic Freedom

Ashley Thorne

The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that Joseph H.H. Weiler, who was accused of libel for publishing a book review unfavorable to the book’s author, Karin Calvo-Goller, has been cleared of charges by a Paris court.

Calvo-Goller brought a lawsuit against Weiler, the editor-in-chief of the European Journal of International Law, after it ran a short review by Thomas Weigend of her book The Trial Proceedings of the International Criminal Court. One sentence from Weigend’s review says, “Karin Calvo-Goller has undoubtedly invested much time and effort into this book, which – but for regrettably sloppy editing – might well serve as a first systematic introduction to the procedural issues confronting the ICC.

When Calvo-Goller complained to Weiler, he offered her space to respond, but she refused and demanded instead that the review be removed from the journal. NAS president Peter Wood, who wrote a letter last year expressing his dismay over the case, spoke from his experience as the editor of a journal that often publishes book reviews: “In my thirty-year career as a scholar, librarian, university director of scholarly publications, and editor of five academic journals, I have never previously encountered such a demand or any instance in which a book review was withdrawn after publication. Dr. Calvo-Goller’s demand in this case is unreasonable and unwarranted.” Professor Weiler, a faculty member at NYU, wrote on his blog, “Since I did not consider the Review libelous its removal in my view would have seriously compromised academic freedom and the intellectual integrity of EJIL and book reviewing generally.”

So it turned out that a French court put an American editor on trial over a German book review that offended an Israeli scholar. Dr. Wood said the greatest concern in the case was that it had ended up in court when it belongs to the realm of academic freedom. Yesterday’s decision confirmed the inappropriateness of the accusation as a lawsuit. According to the Chronicle:

In the ruling, the court said the review expressed a scientific opinion of the book and did not go beyond the kind of criticism to which all authors of intellectual work subject themselves when they publish. It agreed with Mr. Weiler's contention that the case did not properly fall within its jurisdiction anyway. It concluded that Ms. Calvo-Goller had engaged in forum shopping and had shown bad faith in bringing the complaint. It said it was ordering the plaintiff to pay the €8,000 to Mr. Weiler in reparation for the harm caused by the improper nature of her action.

This is a victory for academic freedom. Had the decision gone the other way, it would have had a serious chilling effect on the freedom to critique arguments on their merits. Such freedom is the lifeblood of reasoned scholarship. As Dr. Wood wrote, “The progress of ideas is utterly dependent on the existence of intellectual freedom, unfettered debate, and robust exchange of ideas.” The court ruled rightly, and its judgment should serve as a positive precedent for future aggrieved authors. If they feel they have been misrepresented, they should go through the normal procedures provided by the journal for rebuttal, rather than sue the editor via libel tourism. 

  • Share

Most Commented

June 5, 2024


Subpoenas for All!

Ohio Northern University gnaws its teeth with an appetite for vindictive lawfare....

June 6, 2024


Backlash: Sometimes It Hurts So Good

We have undermined the leftist status quo in higher education for decades with the persistence of Morlocks. You really should be more alarmed about us than you are. Not that I’m going......

May 7, 2024


Biden Admin Is Weaponizing Title IX To Promote Fringe Sexual Politics

Earlier this month, the Office for Civil Rights in the Biden Education Department issued a new regulation on how schools must observe Title IX. This rule transf......

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

May 12, 2017


Harvard Prepares to Host All Black Graduation

Is Harvard's all black graduation a benign trend or a step backwards? ...