Free Speech Vindicated at University of Cincinnati

George W. Dent

This week a federal judge struck down the University of Cincinnati’s policy limiting public speech and demonstrations to a tiny “free speech zone” on the 137-acre campus. Even within that zone university permission was required to speak. The school’s chapter of Young Americans for Liberty wanted to gather signatures for a ballot initiative. It requested and obtained official permission, but it found that that almost no students passed through the free speech zone.

The group sued. It was represented by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (the FIRE) and the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law in Columbus. The court held the policy clearly violated the constitutional right of free speech.

The court’s decision is hardly surprising; nearly every speech restriction at a public college that has been challenged in court has been found unconstitutional. So what might seem surprising is that university officers first imposed this policy and then defended it in court. How could the school’s lawyers have failed to realize that the policy was blatantly illegal?

Of course, these people aren’t stupid. By adopting the policy school officials gained approval from their many constituents who want to repress speech they don’t agree with. The costs of their illegal acts (including attorneys’ fees for the victorious plaintiffs) will be borne not by them but by the taxpayers. School officials had nothing to lose by breaking the law.

What is more surprising is that state Attorney General Mike DeWine—a Republican—not only defended the school’s policy but hired a private law firm at considerable expense to try to beat down the plaintiffs’ lawyers with a blizzard of motions. Fortunately this effort failed, but taxpayers again must foot the bill.

Given all this, it’s hardly surprising that a huge number of public colleges retain speech policies that are clearly unconstitutional. They calculate, cynically but accurately, that no one is likely to take the time, trouble, and expense of calling them on the carpet. However, for those who are willing to make an effort, organizations like the FIRE and the 1851 Center are ready to help.

George W. Dent, Jr. is Professor of Law at Case Western Reserve University school of Law.

  • Share

Most Commented

May 7, 2024


Creating Students, Not Activists

The mobs desecrating the American flag, smashing windows, chanting genocidal slogans—this always was the end game of the advocates of the right to protest, action civics, student activ......

March 9, 2024


A Portrait of Claireve Grandjouan

Claireve Grandjouan, when I knew her, was Head of the Classics Department at Hunter College, and that year gave a three-hour Friday evening class in Egyptian archaeology....

April 20, 2024


The Academic's Roadmap

By all means, pursue your noble dream of improving the condition of humanity through your research and teaching. Could I do it all again, I would, but I would do things very differently....

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 21, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What Does YHWH Elohim Mean?

A reader asks, "If Elohim refers to multiple 'gods,' then Yhwh Elohim really means Lord of Gods...the one of many, right?" A Hebrew expert answers....