Harder Core: UGA Nixes Regional Proposals; Opts for Rigorous Curriculum

Ashley Thorne

In February the University System of Georgia held a “retreat” that produced proposals for two new schemes of core curriculum at Georgia’s 35 public higher education institutions.  The proposal struck members of the NAS in Georgia as a retreat indeed—a retreat from academic standards.  The retreatees appeared to be enamored with the trendy ideas about “developing sustainable responses” in a “complex global environment.” Since then NAS has been paying attention to how the state’s largest university, the University of Georgia, would respond to the proposals.  We now have the answer.

An NAS member who works as an academic advisor at UGA said that, the University, as the system’s flagship school, is exempt from any USG prescriptions for curricula (such as “Framing Worldviews in a Global Environment,” and “From Self to Global Society”). He feared, however, that UGA might be tempted to stir themes like sustainability and social justice into the curriculum reforms already in motion.

Last week, the University of Georgia held a training session in which the advisors were briefed on distribution requirement changes which have been in the works for at least three years. The timing seemed ripe for adopting a curriculum similar to the ones proposed by USG retreat-ites. But the University, it seems, has opted for a worthier pursuit: increase academic rigor and encourage more writing-intensive courses.

“As far as the region’s proposals go, they’re just thinking out loud,” said the academic advisor. “We’re not doing much in respect to that yet.”

The advisor reported that the changes—“an administrative headache”— will reorganize the courses already in place, and will serve primarily to present “a better face for accreditors.”

NAS is glad to see that through its curriculum revisions, UGA has sought to strengthen its intellectual foundations rather than to dilute its material with political propaganda. As occurrences of this kind grow rarer by the day, we believe it’s worth noting when a university does something right.  We particularly applaud UGA’s emphasis on the study of foreign languages, science and technology, and quantitative reasoning.  It is not perfect progress. 

UGA also remains stuck on the idea that universities should teach students to “appreciate” diversity rather than understand it; and the revised standards continue to draw a false distinction between critical thinking and memorization, elevating one and derogating the other.  That’s a dire mistake, with roots in the “progressive” reforms of the early 20th century.  As NAS contributor Michael Booker recounted in a recent issue of Academic Questions (Vol. 20, No. 4 “A Roof Without Walls”), the dismissal of the importance of substantive learning gained further grip mid-century from Benjamin Bloom’s famous taxonomy of learning, in which the acquisition of knowledge was treated as the most rudimentary intellectual skill and “evaluation” the highest.  The trouble is that these days many curricula pay scant heed to furnishing students’ minds with the facts and instead go directly to “critical thinking.” 

We think UGA’s revisions are a step in the right direction, but the work isn’t finished. 

  • Share

Most Commented

January 24, 2024


After Claudine

The idea has caught on that the radical left overplayed its hand in DEI and is now vulnerable to those of us who seek major reforms. This is not, however, the first time that the a......

February 13, 2024


The Great Academic Divorce with China

All signs show that American education is beginning a long and painful divorce with the People’s Republic of China. But will academia go through with it?...

October 31, 2023


University of Washington Violated Non-Discrimination Policy, Internal Report Finds

A faculty hiring committee at the University of Washington “inappropriately considered candidates’ races when determining the order of offers,” provided “disparate op......

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 21, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What Does YHWH Elohim Mean?

A reader asks, "If Elohim refers to multiple 'gods,' then Yhwh Elohim really means Lord of Gods...the one of many, right?" A Hebrew expert answers....