Invitation to Comment on the Proposed Rescinding of the Gainful Employment Rule

National Association of Scholars

Yesterday the Department of Education proposed to rescind the “Gainful Employment Rule,” a regulation that required all for-profit institutions and some non-degree programs at nonprofit institutions to prove the value of their credentials in order to remain eligible for Title IV funding programs.  The rule required that these programs must have a graduate debt-to-discretionary earnings ratio of less than or equal to 20 percent, or debt-to-annual earnings ratio of less than or equal to 8 percent.

Instead, the Department of Education proposes to update the College Scorecard or a similar online platform to reflect “program-level outcomes” for all higher education programs at any institution that participates in Title VI funding programs.

NAS has raised concerns about the Gainful Employment Rule, which was promulgated under the Obama administration as a way to target for-profit colleges and universities. NAS President Peter Wood commented that “The for-profit colleges and universities as they are now are certainly not bastions of scholarship or liberal arts education.” But he also noted that the rule singled out for-profits, perhaps unfairly.

In our 2017 blueprint for the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, the Freedom to Learn Amendments, we proposed that the Gainful Employment Rule should be applied to all institutions—including nonprofits—in order to treat institutions of higher education fairly. NAS has also praised the PROSPER Act, the House Republican bill to reauthorize the Higher Education, which would repeal and prohibit further regulation on the Gainful Employment Rule.

The Department of Education invites concerned parties to submit comments to the Secretary regarding the proposal to rescind this rule. We encourage NAS members to participate in the negotiated rulemaking process by submitting comments. The deadline to do so is September 13, 2018.

There are two ways to submit comments:

Note that the Federal government’s policy is to make all comments publicly available. The Federal government also publishes a list of tips for drafting effective comments on a proposed rule.

  • Share

Most Commented

October 11, 2021

1.

The Shame of MIT: Canceling Dorian Abbot

Professor Abbot was set to deliver MIT's prestigious Carlson Lecture—that is, until he was canceled for his views on DEI programs, earning him a prompt disinvitation....

October 5, 2021

2.

NAS Statement on Gender Ideology in Higher Education

The National Association of Scholars opposes the proliferation of gender ideology in American higher education....

September 9, 2021

3.

Winning the Cold Civil War

The threat from the illiberal left grows. How should we fight it?...

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 15, 2021

2.

Tracking Cancel Culture in Higher Education

UPDATED: A repository of 194 professors, administrators, and students who have been canceled for expressing views deemed unacceptable by higher education ideologues....

May 26, 2010

3.

10 Reasons Not to Go to College

A sampling of arguments for the idea that college may not be for everyone....