Invitation to Comment on the Proposed Rescinding of the Gainful Employment Rule

National Association of Scholars

Yesterday the Department of Education proposed to rescind the “Gainful Employment Rule,” a regulation that required all for-profit institutions and some non-degree programs at nonprofit institutions to prove the value of their credentials in order to remain eligible for Title IV funding programs.  The rule required that these programs must have a graduate debt-to-discretionary earnings ratio of less than or equal to 20 percent, or debt-to-annual earnings ratio of less than or equal to 8 percent.

Instead, the Department of Education proposes to update the College Scorecard or a similar online platform to reflect “program-level outcomes” for all higher education programs at any institution that participates in Title VI funding programs.

NAS has raised concerns about the Gainful Employment Rule, which was promulgated under the Obama administration as a way to target for-profit colleges and universities. NAS President Peter Wood commented that “The for-profit colleges and universities as they are now are certainly not bastions of scholarship or liberal arts education.” But he also noted that the rule singled out for-profits, perhaps unfairly.

In our 2017 blueprint for the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, the Freedom to Learn Amendments, we proposed that the Gainful Employment Rule should be applied to all institutions—including nonprofits—in order to treat institutions of higher education fairly. NAS has also praised the PROSPER Act, the House Republican bill to reauthorize the Higher Education, which would repeal and prohibit further regulation on the Gainful Employment Rule.

The Department of Education invites concerned parties to submit comments to the Secretary regarding the proposal to rescind this rule. We encourage NAS members to participate in the negotiated rulemaking process by submitting comments. The deadline to do so is September 13, 2018.

There are two ways to submit comments:

Note that the Federal government’s policy is to make all comments publicly available. The Federal government also publishes a list of tips for drafting effective comments on a proposed rule.

  • Share

Most Commented

October 25, 2022

1.

NAS President Peter Wood Addresses the Pending Racial Preferences Cases

Read NAS president Peter Wood's remarks on the upcoming Supreme Court cases, which he presented at a meeting of "Oasis," an informal group of academics and intellectuals based in......

July 25, 2022

2.

Against Transgenderism

The ideology of transgenderism strives to slam shut any door that offers opposition to its attempts to acquire power and control. This statement explains our opposition to such an ideology i......

October 20, 2022

3.

NAS Statement on Nomination of Ben Sasse for University of Florida President

We believe that Senator Sasse would make an excellent president of the University of Florida, and we urge the Board of Trustees to follow the search committee’s recommendation....

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

May 12, 2017

3.

Harvard Prepares to Host All Black Graduation

Is Harvard's all black graduation a benign trend or a step backwards? ...