NAS Opposes American Studies Association Boycott of Israel

Peter Wood

The National Association of Scholars opposes academic boycotts in general and in particular the movement promoted by the U.S. Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel.  That movement is the U.S. arm of the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI).  This matter commands our present attention because of a resolution put before the membership of the American Studies Association by its National Council on December 4.  The membership has been asked to vote on the resolution by Sunday, December 15. 

The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) has published an “Open Letter to Members of the American Studies Association,” which says most of what needs to be said about academic boycotts.  Such actions are antithetical to the free exchange of ideas and undermine academic freedom.  In this case as in many others, proposed boycotts also entail an “ideological litmus test” that has no legitimate place in higher education. 

The AAUP allows that some cases are “so dire as to require compromising basic precepts of academic freedom.”  There may well be such circumstances in which the principle of academic freedom must be matched against competing principles of human decency.  But the situation presented by this campaign to boycott Israel is nothing of the sort.  It is rather a form of political activism on behalf of one party in long-standing dispute. 

The National Association of Scholars does not have a foreign policy and does not take a position on Israeli-Palestinian relations.  We do take positions on academic freedom and on the misuse of academic prestige and authority.  The National Council of the American Studies Association has abused both by its unanimous vote in favor of this boycott.  We applaud the fifty-plus ASA members, including seven past presidents, who signed a letter opposing the boycott as an infringement of academic freedom. 

The ASA’s National Council has also drawn attention to the enervation of the discipline it represents.  As one critic noted, the call for a boycott comes at a time when the liberal arts in American higher education are on the decline and serious scholarship in American Studies has thinned.  Why should ASA in such circumstances “marginalize itself” by striking a position “at the farthest-out fringe of American politics?” 

The proposed resolution may be the febrile response of a faction that has lost its true sense of obligation to scholarship, teaching, and the university. We hope that the members of the American Studies Association rise to the provocation by soundly defeating the motion.  

  • Share

Most Commented

June 5, 2024


Subpoenas for All!

Ohio Northern University gnaws its teeth with an appetite for vindictive lawfare....

June 6, 2024


Backlash: Sometimes It Hurts So Good

We have undermined the leftist status quo in higher education for decades with the persistence of Morlocks. You really should be more alarmed about us than you are. Not that I’m going......

May 7, 2024


Biden Admin Is Weaponizing Title IX To Promote Fringe Sexual Politics

Earlier this month, the Office for Civil Rights in the Biden Education Department issued a new regulation on how schools must observe Title IX. This rule transf......

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

May 12, 2017


Harvard Prepares to Host All Black Graduation

Is Harvard's all black graduation a benign trend or a step backwards? ...