Obama's NLRB Pushes Faculty Unionization

George Leef

Obama has loaded the National Labor Relations Board with pro-union activists, just as he’s done with every other federal regulatory agency. The Board’s decisions have pushed the union agenda to the utmost and a recent decision clears the way for the unionization of faculty members at private colleges and universities.

In today’s Pope Center Clarion Call, economics professor Charles Baird, who experienced unionization when he taught at Cal State Eastbay, discusses that decision (Pacific Lutheran) and explains why he regards it as bad law. It’s bad law because it overthrows court precedents that blocked faculty unionization, but also bad because faculty unionization is detrimental to the educational endeavor. “Unionization of the faculty undermines effort. The administration must adhere slavishly to the collective bargaining agreement, which treats all faculty members alike, whether excellent or indolent. Faculty unions turn higher education into something more like an industrial assembly line than an intellectual enterprise,” Baird writes.

He also points out that the way unionization occurs under the National Labor Relations Act, if a majority wants representation by a union, then all of the faculty members must accept that union as their exclusive representative in dealing with the school. Forced collectivization replaces individual action, and if the union uses dues money for purposes that one or more of those faculty members opposes, the only recourse is to endure a legal battle with the union to secure some reduction in dues — see Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Association.

Finally, Baird argues that unionization can only hinder colleges and universities as they search for the optimal ways of delivering educational opportunities to students. It is clear that we’re entering a period of change and adjustment in higher education. (If you doubt that, read Kevin Carey’s new book The End of College, about which I’ll have more to say soon.) Change is inevitable and schools will have to be nimble if they are to survive. “Unions,” Baird writes, “have long opposed free trade in goods and services. Faculty unions are just as likely to oppose the free trade in ideas that is crucial for academic innovation. The apparatchiks in the NLRB may think that facilitating unionization in higher education is a good idea, but from personal experience, I say they are mistaken.”

Image: Toledo Blade

  • Share

Most Commented

January 9, 2023


NAS Celebrates the Nomination of Reform-Minded Trustees to the New College of Florida Board

The National Association of Scholars is delighted with Governor Ron DeSantis’ nomination of six education reformers to the Board of Trustees of the New College of Florida....

December 7, 2022


New Study Tracks Rise of DEI in STEM Departments, Associations, Grants, and Literature

A new study published today by the National Association of Scholars, Ideological Intensification, offers an in-depth quantitative analysis of just how far DEI has advanced into STEM fields....

January 5, 2023


NAS Condemns the Attacks against Jordan Peterson

The National Association of Scholars condemns the unrelenting illiberal attacks being levied against Dr. Peterson and against anyone who dares push back against the enemies of intellectual f......

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 19, 2022


How Many Confucius Institutes Are in the United States?

UPDATED: We're keeping track of all Confucius Institutes in the United States, including those that remain open, those that closed, and those that have announced their closing....