Richard Vedder on PSU Report and University Governance

Glenn Ricketts

Writing on his blog over at the CHE, NAS board member Richard Vedder has some thoughts on the Penn State sexual abuse scandal and the recently issued Freeh report which minced no words in assessing blame.   

 He notes that, beyond the fault assigned to high-profile figures such as former PSU president Graham Spanier and disgraced head football coach, the late Joe Paterno, the Freeh report also slams the school’s board of trustees for failing miserably in its fiduciary responsibilities.  As the school’s official governing body, the PSU board sat happily on the sidelines, clueless about the sordid conduct of the officials supposedly within the purview of its oversight responsibilities.  

Unfortunately, as Vedder observes, that’s probably no different than what the great majority of boards elsewhere would have done, had they been in similar circumstances.  Like their colleagues at Penn State, they’re quickly and easily co-opted by the administration, who know how to ply them with lavish annual dinners and free football tickets on the fifty-yard line.  And if board members do receive any information about campus affairs, it usually comes to them via the president and his staff.  

I have to wonder, as a practical matter, how involved most board members are likely to be in any case – most of them carry heavy obligations elsewhere, meet perhaps bi-annually,  and don’t follow university affairs too closely.  Many of them, I suspect, are highly flattered that they've been selected for board service. They also usually come with a strong sense of institutional loyalty – rah-rahs, really - and are instinctively averse to bad publicity: potential scandals should be diverted if they can, not investigated.  

So given the widespread logistical obstacles and inertia that inhibit college trustees, how can they be kept better informed, like it or not?  Vedder proposes a compelling, easy-to-implement change in the structure found at most schools: 

Specifically, I think every public university, and probably most private ones, should have an employee whose “boss” is not the university administration but the chair of the board of trustees, and whose function it is to independently inform the board of anything that could potentially harm the university. 

If, as a result of the Penn State fiasco, we’re finally going to see a fundamental overhaul of university governance, this seems like the optimal starting point.

  • Share

Most Commented

July 12, 2023


Scott Gerber’s Case in Context

Ohio Northern University seems intent on chiseling into granite its protocol for getting rid of a faculty member who disagrees with the institution’s woke ideology, even when the......

July 19, 2023


On Collegiality

Increasingly, collegiality is being added to the traditional triad of excellence that wins professors tenure. And now, the issue of collegiality is a fraught minefield, and has become&#......

June 22, 2023


Accreditation? A Woke, Good-Cop-Bad-Cop Scam

The “diversity” bug afflicts almost all of academia; dissenters face opprobrium. But the very same mindset controls accreditors....

Most Read

April 14, 2023


Faculty Fight for Academic Freedom at Harvard

While many faculty quietly endorse views they privately disagree with, Harvard faculty band together to resist administrative overreach, overzealous students, and protect academic freedom....

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

June 20, 2023


How Many Confucius Institutes Are in the United States?

UPDATED: We're keeping track of all Confucius Institutes in the United States, including those that remain open, those that closed, and those that have announced their closing....