Supreme Court to Hear Proposition 2 Case

Glenn Ricketts

The Supreme Court will be handing down another major affirmative action decision: yesterday the Court announced that it had granted certiorari in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action

That’s the official title of the case which arose from Proposition 2, a ballot intiative in which a thumping  58% of  Michigan's voters approved an amendment to their state’s constitution banning the use of racial preferences in admissions to the state’s public colleges and universities.  In plain English, the state was now prohibited from using any form of racial classification in considering applicants to its public institutions.  That is racial discrimination, inconsistent with the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment to the US Constitution.  NAS, of course, along with our Michigan affiliate, actively supported Proposition 2, consistent with our unchanging opposition to group preferences of any kind.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals read the US Constitution with strangely tinted lenses, however, and promptly overturned the initiative:  the 14th Amendment, you see, actually does not allow anyone to ban racial discrimination in this manner.  Yes that’s what the 8-7 majority ruled – the Constitution, in the name of fair and equal treatment, does not permit the prohibition of racial discrimination.  Really.  See comments here, here and here for some insightful analysis of this extraordinary verdict.

This news comes as the Court is already hearing arguments in Fisher v. Texas, another major case involving the use of racial preferences at the University of Texas, Austin.

The outcomes of these cases are anyone’s guess, and the Supreme Court has often defied the expectations of the best informed legal prognostications.  It seems safe to venture that the justices will divide closely, and could split 4-4 because of  Justice Elena Kagan’s recusal from both cases. 

Our hope of course, is for a straight reading of the 14th Amendment that simply prohibits the use of racial quotas, which the Court has thus far not been willing to do.  But the die has now been cast, so we’re about to find out.

  • Share

Most Commented

May 7, 2024


Creating Students, Not Activists

The mobs desecrating the American flag, smashing windows, chanting genocidal slogans—this always was the end game of the advocates of the right to protest, action civics, student activ......

March 9, 2024


A Portrait of Claireve Grandjouan

Claireve Grandjouan, when I knew her, was Head of the Classics Department at Hunter College, and that year gave a three-hour Friday evening class in Egyptian archaeology....

April 20, 2024


The Academic's Roadmap

By all means, pursue your noble dream of improving the condition of humanity through your research and teaching. Could I do it all again, I would, but I would do things very differently....

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 21, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What Does YHWH Elohim Mean?

A reader asks, "If Elohim refers to multiple 'gods,' then Yhwh Elohim really means Lord of Gods...the one of many, right?" A Hebrew expert answers....