The "Painful Truth" About Affirmative Action

Glenn Ricketts

Have a look at this piece by Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr. in the current Atlantic.  It’s culled from their new book, out this month, on the continuing disaster of the race-based admissions policies so widely practiced and heatedly denied by college and university administrators.

Sander and Taylor are up front in declaring flatly that the Emperor is unclad: however commendable the original intentions that spawned them, the current regime of racial preferences is deeply divisive, manifestly unjust and, worst of all, profoundly harmful to its designated beneficiaries. To that I’d add the profoundly corrupting effects of the institutionalized hypocrisy and inevitable dishonesty practiced by those who preside over the system.  They can’t really believe the things they so cheerfully tell you, can they?  But then, many of them have done it for so long, who knows?

At the center of it all is what the authors call “mismatch.” Minority students who might expect to do well enough at a good second- or third-tier state institution are often admitted to elite schools where the level of competition and preparation far exceeds their capabilities.  It’s something like throwing a beginning swimming student immediately into the deep end of the pool with the varsity high-diving team.  The difference, of course, is that we wouldn’t do that with athletes, because we’d have sense enough to understand what the results would be.  

But such common sense simply doesn’t apply where racial preferences are concerned, and many minority students forced to compete at a level beyond their competence routinely end up as academic failures, embittered and isolated.  There's also  the injustice done to the more qualified students who had to be rejected so “diversity” targets could be met. 

It’s hard to see where anyone comes out a winner in this Orwellian bean-counting charade except perhaps the admissions officers who can claim that they met their quotas and senior administrators who can boast about the “diverse” institution over which they preside.  And of course, nobody can call them racists, right?

  • Share

Most Commented

December 7, 2022

1.

New Study Tracks Rise of DEI in STEM Departments, Associations, Grants, and Literature

A new study published today by the National Association of Scholars, Ideological Intensification, offers an in-depth quantitative analysis of just how far DEI has advanced into STEM fields....

January 9, 2023

2.

NAS Celebrates the Nomination of Reform-Minded Trustees to the New College of Florida Board

The National Association of Scholars is delighted with Governor Ron DeSantis’ nomination of six education reformers to the Board of Trustees of the New College of Florida....

October 20, 2022

3.

NAS Statement on Nomination of Ben Sasse for University of Florida President

We believe that Senator Sasse would make an excellent president of the University of Florida, and we urge the Board of Trustees to follow the search committee’s recommendation....

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

January 5, 2023

3.

NAS Condemns the Attacks against Jordan Peterson

The National Association of Scholars condemns the unrelenting illiberal attacks being levied against Dr. Peterson and against anyone who dares push back against the enemies of intellectual f......