David Clemens

This morning I heard from a necessarily anonymous colleague who teaches at a necessarily anonymous college.  Her Dean had refused to sign off on a grant application because the granting foundation makes some “religious references” in its mission statement (“Judeo-Christian”).  Eek!  So now our fraidy cat, politically correct administrative class feels obliged to torpedo grant applications because of its own theophobia. It’s not just grants.  The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education lists over 30 cases related to religious liberty.  Then there’s Martin Gaskell, the Christian, University of Kentucky astronomer who sued when he was passed over for a job because some colleagues feared he was “possibly evangelical.”  Eek!  Theophobia!  As UK was writing him a $125,000 settlement check, Gaskell’s attorney said, “. . . what . . . this case disclosed is a kind of endemic, almost knee-jerk reaction in academia towards people, especially scientists, of a strong religious faith." Such exquisite administrative sensitivity to the establishment clause raises serious questions about curriculum.  How do you understand history without some knowledge of religion?  How do you understand the American colonization, our founding documents, the Civil War, abolitionists, 9/11, The Reverend Martin Luther King?  Revisionist historians who revile any hint of virtue in American history continue to insist that the Civil War was not about slavery, yet a Civil War history book I own, published in 1865, ends with these words, “GOD REIGNS, AND SLAVERY IS DEAD,” making it 0 for 2 in today’s academy. In literature, how do you understand the Trojan War, Dante, Milton, Hawthorne, Flannery O’Connor, even Thomas Pynchon?  In 2009, I organized a Great Books panel for the Association of Literary Scholars and Critics Conference in Denver.  Dr. Joshua Pederson, Adjunct Professor of Religious Studies at Marymount Manhattan College, presented a compelling argument in his paper, “Examining the Inquisitor: On the Continuing Importance of Biblical Literacy to Literary Studies.”   If you subtract religious references, Christ, and the Grand Inquisitor from Dostoyevsky’s parable, there’s nothing left but punctuation marks. Instead of institutional theophobia, perhaps it’s time for a graduation requirement in religious literacy.

  • Share

Most Commented

May 7, 2024


Creating Students, Not Activists

The mobs desecrating the American flag, smashing windows, chanting genocidal slogans—this always was the end game of the advocates of the right to protest, action civics, student activ......

March 9, 2024


A Portrait of Claireve Grandjouan

Claireve Grandjouan, when I knew her, was Head of the Classics Department at Hunter College, and that year gave a three-hour Friday evening class in Egyptian archaeology....

April 20, 2024


The Academic's Roadmap

By all means, pursue your noble dream of improving the condition of humanity through your research and teaching. Could I do it all again, I would, but I would do things very differently....

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

June 5, 2024


Subpoenas for All!

Ohio Northern University knaws its teeth with an appitite for vindictive lawfare....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...