The Oregon Association of Scholars (OAS) has just submitted an excellent public comment to the Oregon Senate Committee on Education, opposing a bill that will impose a politicized, grievance-studies history curriculum on Oregon public school students, in the guise of teaching them about genocide. As the OAS puts it in their executive summary,

  • SB 664 will result not in education but propaganda, imposing a narrow partisan view on history leading directly to ideological browbeating and indoctrination of students.
  • SB 664 links genocide to situations in which a group suffers real, trivial, or even imagined harm, grossly distorting history and trivializing genocide and the Holocaust.
  • SB 664’s language suggests that the goal is to conflate genocide with other forms of prejudice in ways that are historically inaccurate so as to politicize the curriculum.
  • SB 664 is counterproductive, there being evidence that the perverse results of such programs divide rather than unite, making stereotyping and discrimination more likely.
  • SB 664 is an irresponsible attempt to reduce Oregon’s complex history to “genocide,” a serious disservice that the legislature needs to thwart rather than impose.
  • SB 664 requires one-sided social activism by students.
  • SB 664 exhibits profound political bias and attempts to repress diverse viewpoints. Passage will increase student flight from the public system.

Unfortunately, Oregon isn’t the only state where political activists are smuggling in grievance-studies propaganda in the guise of genocide education. The OAS notes that “Between 1989 and 2018, 10 states adopted such mandates while a further 19 have pledged to do so.” It is likely that the tactic used in Oregon will soon be used in all fifty states.

The NAS commends the OAS for its fine public comment. We also encourage readers in other states to keep an eye out for similar bills. When they get introduced, tell us--and you’ll do good work if you submit a similar comment of your own.

  • Share

Most Commented

October 25, 2022

1.

NAS President Peter Wood Addresses the Pending Racial Preferences Cases

Read NAS president Peter Wood's remarks on the upcoming Supreme Court cases, which he presented at a meeting of "Oasis," an informal group of academics and intellectuals based in......

July 25, 2022

2.

Against Transgenderism

The ideology of transgenderism strives to slam shut any door that offers opposition to its attempts to acquire power and control. This statement explains our opposition to such an ideology i......

October 20, 2022

3.

NAS Statement on Nomination of Ben Sasse for University of Florida President

We believe that Senator Sasse would make an excellent president of the University of Florida, and we urge the Board of Trustees to follow the search committee’s recommendation....

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

May 28, 2009

3.

"O Cosmic Birther!" The Lord's Prayer Meets the American College Textbook

A philosophy professor finds an Internet legend subbing for the Gospel truth and looks in vain for "critical reasoning."...