Fringe History, Flawed Scholarship

National Association of Scholars

Fringe History, Flawed Scholarship

Wednesday, February 3rd at 2 pm ET

On Zoom

National Association of Scholars President Peter Wood's 1620: A Critical Response to the 1619 Project critiques the New York Times' 1619 Project. The Times set out to transform history by tracing American institutions, culture, and prosperity to slavery and the exploitation of African Americans that followed. A controversy erupted, with historians pushing back against what they say is a false narrative conjured out of racial grievance. Wood's 1620 sums up what the critics have said and argues that the proper starting point for the American story is 1620, with the signing of the Mayflower Compact before the Pilgrims set foot in the Massachusetts wilderness. A nation as complex as ours, of course, has many starting points, most notably the Declaration of Independence in 1776. But the quintessential ideas of American self-government and ordered liberty grew from the deliberate actions of the Mayflower immigrants in 1620. Schools across the country should teach that what has always made America exceptional is our pursuit of liberty and justice for all—and that slavery, and the nation's early addiction to it, was an obstacle we overcame to realize America's founding principles.

Join the National Association of Scholars on February 3 at 2 pm ET for Fringe History, Flawed Scholarship, an event that will assemble notable scholars to comment on different aspects of Wood's 1620, the 1619 Project, and the true nature of American history.

This event will take particular notice of the prospects for proper American history instruction, given that federal policymakers seem to display great sympathy toward the 1619 Project narrative of American history.

Speakers:

Phil Magness, senior research fellow, American Institute for Economic Research; author of The 1619 Project: A Critique.

Robert Paquette, president, Alexander Hamilton Institute for the Study of Western Civilization.

Ian Rowe, senior visiting fellow, The Woodson Center; resident scholar, American Enterprise Institute.

Peter W. Wood, president, National Association of Scholars; author of 1620: A Critical Response to the 1619 Project.

  • Share

Most Commented

October 25, 2022

1.

NAS President Peter Wood Addresses the Pending Racial Preferences Cases

Read NAS president Peter Wood's remarks on the upcoming Supreme Court cases, which he presented at a meeting of "Oasis," an informal group of academics and intellectuals based in......

July 25, 2022

2.

Against Transgenderism

The ideology of transgenderism strives to slam shut any door that offers opposition to its attempts to acquire power and control. This statement explains our opposition to such an ideology i......

October 20, 2022

3.

NAS Statement on Nomination of Ben Sasse for University of Florida President

We believe that Senator Sasse would make an excellent president of the University of Florida, and we urge the Board of Trustees to follow the search committee’s recommendation....

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

May 12, 2017

3.

Harvard Prepares to Host All Black Graduation

Is Harvard's all black graduation a benign trend or a step backwards? ...