Fringe History, Flawed Scholarship

National Association of Scholars

Fringe History, Flawed Scholarship

Wednesday, February 3rd at 2 pm ET

On Zoom

National Association of Scholars President Peter Wood's 1620: A Critical Response to the 1619 Project critiques the New York Times' 1619 Project. The Times set out to transform history by tracing American institutions, culture, and prosperity to slavery and the exploitation of African Americans that followed. A controversy erupted, with historians pushing back against what they say is a false narrative conjured out of racial grievance. Wood's 1620 sums up what the critics have said and argues that the proper starting point for the American story is 1620, with the signing of the Mayflower Compact before the Pilgrims set foot in the Massachusetts wilderness. A nation as complex as ours, of course, has many starting points, most notably the Declaration of Independence in 1776. But the quintessential ideas of American self-government and ordered liberty grew from the deliberate actions of the Mayflower immigrants in 1620. Schools across the country should teach that what has always made America exceptional is our pursuit of liberty and justice for all—and that slavery, and the nation's early addiction to it, was an obstacle we overcame to realize America's founding principles.

Join the National Association of Scholars on February 3 at 2 pm ET for Fringe History, Flawed Scholarship, an event that will assemble notable scholars to comment on different aspects of Wood's 1620, the 1619 Project, and the true nature of American history.

This event will take particular notice of the prospects for proper American history instruction, given that federal policymakers seem to display great sympathy toward the 1619 Project narrative of American history.

Speakers:

Phil Magness, senior research fellow, American Institute for Economic Research; author of The 1619 Project: A Critique.

Robert Paquette, president, Alexander Hamilton Institute for the Study of Western Civilization.

Ian Rowe, senior visiting fellow, The Woodson Center; resident scholar, American Enterprise Institute.

Peter W. Wood, president, National Association of Scholars; author of 1620: A Critical Response to the 1619 Project.

  • Share

Most Commented

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

April 19, 2021

2.

UT Austin Approves Orwellian “Strategic Plan for Faculty Diversity, Equity, and Inclusivity”

Sadly, the University of Texas at Austin did not heed our repeated warnings about the direct threat to academic freedom and institutional neutrality posed by its now-appr......

June 10, 2021

3.

Tracking "Cancel Culture" in Higher Education

UPDATED: A repository of 176 administrators, professors, and students who have been "canceled" for expressing views deemed unacceptable by higher education ideologues....

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

May 24, 2021

2.

The Jay Bergman Debacle: An Extended Study in Academic Cancel Culture

CCSU Professor of History and long-time NAS Board member Jay Bergman is under fire from colleagues, school superintendents, and the local media. His crime? Criticizing the 1619 Project....

May 18, 2021

3.

How Many Confucius Institutes Are in the United States?

Updated 5/18/2021: We're keeping track of all Confucius Institutes in the United States, including those that remain open, those that closed, and those that have announced their clo......