Fringe History, Flawed Scholarship

National Association of Scholars

Fringe History, Flawed Scholarship

Wednesday, February 3rd at 2 pm ET

On Zoom

National Association of Scholars President Peter Wood's 1620: A Critical Response to the 1619 Project critiques the New York Times' 1619 Project. The Times set out to transform history by tracing American institutions, culture, and prosperity to slavery and the exploitation of African Americans that followed. A controversy erupted, with historians pushing back against what they say is a false narrative conjured out of racial grievance. Wood's 1620 sums up what the critics have said and argues that the proper starting point for the American story is 1620, with the signing of the Mayflower Compact before the Pilgrims set foot in the Massachusetts wilderness. A nation as complex as ours, of course, has many starting points, most notably the Declaration of Independence in 1776. But the quintessential ideas of American self-government and ordered liberty grew from the deliberate actions of the Mayflower immigrants in 1620. Schools across the country should teach that what has always made America exceptional is our pursuit of liberty and justice for all—and that slavery, and the nation's early addiction to it, was an obstacle we overcame to realize America's founding principles.

Join the National Association of Scholars on February 3 at 2 pm ET for Fringe History, Flawed Scholarship, an event that will assemble notable scholars to comment on different aspects of Wood's 1620, the 1619 Project, and the true nature of American history.

This event will take particular notice of the prospects for proper American history instruction, given that federal policymakers seem to display great sympathy toward the 1619 Project narrative of American history.

Speakers:

Phil Magness, senior research fellow, American Institute for Economic Research; author of The 1619 Project: A Critique.

Robert Paquette, president, Alexander Hamilton Institute for the Study of Western Civilization.

Ian Rowe, senior visiting fellow, The Woodson Center; resident scholar, American Enterprise Institute.

Peter W. Wood, president, National Association of Scholars; author of 1620: A Critical Response to the 1619 Project.

  • Share

Most Commented

November 24, 2021

1.

1619 Again: Revisiting the Project's Troubled Past

New York Times editor Jake Silverstein's new essay on the 1619 Project attempts to glide past the awkwardness that accompanied the project’s early days. Let's set the reco......

December 14, 2021

2.

Confronting Woke Groupthink in Art Education

The dubious notion that the U.S. is a “systemically racist” nation has taken hold in art education, as in virtually every sphere of American life....

January 18, 2022

3.

The White House Is Undermining Science, Not Defending It

Government support of scientific research is not designed to support science, but to harness science to political ends....

Most Read

January 18, 2022

1.

The White House Is Undermining Science, Not Defending It

Government support of scientific research is not designed to support science, but to harness science to political ends....

September 21, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What Does YHWH Elohim Mean?

A reader asks, "If Elohim refers to multiple 'gods,' then Yhwh Elohim really means Lord of Gods...the one of many, right?" A Hebrew expert answers....

January 12, 2022

3.

Press Release: NAS Appoints Dr. J. Scott Turner as Director of the Diversity in the Sciences Project

As project director, Dr. Turner will be conducting research on the scope and deleterious effects of DEI initiatives in STEM programs across the country....