Episode #50: The Partisan Professoriate with Mitchell Langbert

Peter Wood

In this week’s episode, Peter is joined by Mitchell Langbert, Associate Professor of Business at Brooklyn College, to discuss the political affiliation of university professors and his upcoming article in Academic Questions. As the nation’s partisan divide entrenches itself, more attention is being paid to what affect this partisanship has on teaching, research, and institutional trust. Peter and Mitchell go on to discuss Sarah Lawrence College and the internal contradictions of John Dewey’s progressive education.

Show Notes

3:10 Mitchell discusses his interest in organizations and how that connects to his research on the partisan affiliation of professors.

5:29 Is the overwhelmingly leftward tilt of university faculty due to self-selection?

7:24 Peter asks Mitchell: Is there’s anything in your early life that lead you to delve into the partisan affiliation of professors?

9:19 Mitchell discusses academia is as a political tool.

12:12 Peter asks: “Why did you go into such a crowded field? How did you manage to attract so much attention to your work? “

16:30 Mitchell and Peter discuss the various hypotheses explaining the gap between conservative and liberal faculty. They take particular aim at the self-selection hypothesis.

20:36 Peter and Mitchell discuss the de-Christianization of colleges throughout the 20th century

22:05 What is CFAT? And why did it have such a heavy hand in transforming universities from conservative bastions to staples of progressivism?

24:26 The ratio of Democrats to Republicans is 10.5 to 1 across the colleges he surveyed. Mitchell explains how he came to that ratio. Another 39% of colleges surveyed did not have a single Republican.

25:48 Peter asks, “Why are Republicans so toxic?” Mitchell and Peter discuss the various ways that the political parties have consolidated or split, and how partisanship effects institutional biases and prestige.

33:00 Mitchell explains the various breakdowns of his data by discipline, region, and gender. They also discuss the various disciplines that have “balance” such as STEM.

47:10 Mitchell discusses his use of federal contribution data to illustrate the polarization of faculty.

1:01:45 Mitchell discusses his upcoming article in Academic Questions on the failure of progressive learning at Sarah Lawrence College.


Mitchell Langbert and Sean Stevens, “Partisan Registration and Contributions of Faculty in Flagship Colleges,” nas.org, January 17, 2020.

Mitchell Langbert, “Homogenous: The Political Affiliations of Elite Liberal Arts College Faculty,” Academic Questions 31.2, Summer 2018.

  • Share

Most Commented

October 31, 2023


University of Washington Violated Non-Discrimination Policy, Internal Report Finds

A faculty hiring committee at the University of Washington “inappropriately considered candidates’ races when determining the order of offers,” provided “disparate op......

January 24, 2024


After Claudine

The idea has caught on that the radical left overplayed its hand in DEI and is now vulnerable to those of us who seek major reforms. This is not, however, the first time that the a......

December 9, 2023


The Presidents and Academic Freedom

What are the boundaries of “free speech?” They are pretty much the same as the boundaries of civilization. Savages need not apply....

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 21, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What Does YHWH Elohim Mean?

A reader asks, "If Elohim refers to multiple 'gods,' then Yhwh Elohim really means Lord of Gods...the one of many, right?" A Hebrew expert answers....