Legally Wrong: When Courts and Science Meet with Nathan Schachtman

Episode #54

David Randall

Washington bureaucrats only make half of America's science policy. Judges, juries, and lawyers make the other through billion-dollar lawsuits decided in courts around the nation. Nathan A. Schachtman, whose work focuses on pharmaceutical and environmental cases, is one of the few lawyers who knows how science and statistics work in the courtroom—and what the legal and financial consequences are when the courts get their science wrong.

To discuss this, Nathan A. Schachtman joins Curriculum Vitae. In this episode, Nathan explains how the law changed to give judges and juries the responsibility to judge questions of scientific fact and statistical analysis—and how judges and juries too often base their decisions on bad science. He also discusses why the legal system needs to take account of the irreproducibility crisis in modern science and how lawyers use that crisis in the courtroom, sometimes to support shaky arguments with massive financial stakes. Finally, Nathan recommends major educational and legal reforms to make sure our judges and juries use reliable science and statistics.

Judges and juries are making science policy right now, by case and precedent. Nathan opens a window into this extraordinarily important world, and starts us thinking about what we can do to make sure our courts do the best possible job when they judge science and statistics.

If you’re interested in reading more of Nathan’s work, check out his blog (http://schachtmanlaw.com/blog)—where he writes informatively and entertainingly about science, statistics, and the law.

  • Share

Most Commented

August 17, 2021

1.

Fermilab Concedes to Woke Physicists

Known for its powerful particle accelerator, Fermilab epitomizes American physics research. But after accusations of racism, a group of woke physicists now controls the lab....

July 7, 2021

2.

CRT in Higher Education: Is a Day of Reckoning Coming for the University of Texas?

UT President Hartzell has been content to ignore critics regarding his institution's plunge into wokeism. With a Texas Legislature special session coming up, he may be in for a rude awak......

July 20, 2021

3.

NAS Opposes the ABA’s Woke Standards for Law Schools

The American Bar Association would like the nation’s already-radicalized law schools to become even more so. We must step up and challenge this....

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 8, 2021

3.

How Many Confucius Institutes Are in the United States?

UPDATED: We're keeping track of all Confucius Institutes in the United States, including those that remain open, those that closed, and those that have announced their closing....