Legislation, Not Litigation, Can Repeal Racial Preferences, Says NAS

National Association of Scholars

New York, NY (June 24, 2016)—The National Association of Scholars (NAS) today released a statement responding to the Supreme Court’s June 23 decision in the case on affirmative action, Fisher v. University of Texas.

The statement says that the NAS “deeply regrets” the Court’s 4-3 decision to allow the University of Texas to persist in using race-based preferences in student admissions. The statement analyzes Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion and Justice Alito’s dissent, and it asserts that “’diversity’ is an acid” that weakens almost every aspect of higher education, not just admissions.

NAS urges legislation, not litigation, as the way to more effectively fight racial preferences in American colleges and universities. It points to successful ballot initiatives and state bills enacted in Arizona, California, Michigan, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Washington as the examples to follow. NAS members wrote the text of California’s Proposition 209, which voters passed in 1996.

NAS concludes by affirming that it will not relent from fighting racial discrimination in higher education, and that it is uniquely positioned for such a fight, having “the experience, testimony, and insight of thousands of academics who know firsthand what the ‘diversity’ doctrine does to liberal education, and how our colleges and universities will act on this decision far beyond its supposedly limited application to the University of Texas at Austin.”

Peter Wood, NAS president, said, “Americans want to see every individual treated as equal before the law. I have faith in citizens that they can recognize discrimination and will, if given the choice, reject it. And I have faith in the members of the National Association of Scholars to lead the way.”

Read the full statement >

About NAS: The National Association of Scholars upholds the standards of a liberal arts education that fosters intellectual freedom, searches for the truth, and promotes virtuous citizenship.

# # # #

Image: Pexels

  • Share

Most Commented

July 12, 2023

1.

Scott Gerber’s Case in Context

Ohio Northern University seems intent on chiseling into granite its protocol for getting rid of a faculty member who disagrees with the institution’s woke ideology, even when the......

July 19, 2023

2.

On Collegiality

Increasingly, collegiality is being added to the traditional triad of excellence that wins professors tenure. And now, the issue of collegiality is a fraught minefield, and has become&#......

June 20, 2023

3.

Letter: Academic Freedom Requires More Than Words

There is still no word from Ohio Northern University administrators after their removal of Professor Scott Gerber without due process—a clear violation of Gerber's rights......

Most Read

April 14, 2023

1.

Faculty Fight for Academic Freedom at Harvard

While many faculty quietly endorse views they privately disagree with, Harvard faculty band together to resist administrative overreach, overzealous students, and protect academic freedom....

May 15, 2015

2.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010

3.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...