NAS Re-publishes "The Case for Colonialism"

In Support of Academic Freed

National Association of Scholars

NEW YORK, NY, June 13, 2018 – The National Association of Scholars (NAS) has re-published the most controversial academic article of the last few years, “The Case for Colonialism,” by Portland State University Bruce Gilley. A torrent of protest, including death threats, followed the initial publication of the article in Third World Quarterly in 2017.

The NAS has re-published “The Case for Colonialism” to ensure that it will be permanently available to students, scholars, and the general public.

Gilley’s article had undergone double-blind peer review before it was first published, but it aroused immediate fury. More than 16,000 people around the world petitioned to have the article censored. They also demanded that Third World Quarterly apologize and the editor be fired. Fifteen members of the journal’s thirty-four-member editorial board also resigned in objection to the article. Initially the publisher stood its ground, but after receiving serious threats of violence against the editor, the publisher withdrew the article. Gilley, the author, was also personally and professionally attacked and received death threats.

“The efforts to censor Bruce Gilley’s article and the attacks on him personally were outrageous,” said NAS President Peter Wood. “Gilley published a well-reasoned and humane perspective on the political and economic challenges that face many Third World nations. Anyone who actually reads the article will see his thoughtful tone and good will.”

“But we live in a time when many in the academic world believe they have the right to prevent the expression of views they disagree with,” Wood continued. “The actions of those who sought to suppress Gilley’s article demonstrate this. The intolerance and anti-intellectualism displayed in this instance reached a new extreme. The NAS is pleased to restore this important article to its legitimate place in academic debate.”

“The Case for Colonialism” is available to read on NAS.org and within the pages of the summer 2018 issue of our quarterly journal, Academic Questions

NAS is a network of scholars and citizens united by a commitment to academic freedom, disinterested scholarship, and excellence in American higher education. Membership in NAS is open to all who share a commitment to these broad principles. NAS publishes a journal and has state and regional affiliates. Visit NAS at www.nas.org.

###

If you would like more information about this issue, please call Chance Layton at 917-551-6770 or email [email protected].


Photo: By Bundesarchiv, Bild 105-DOA6369 / Walther Dobbertin / CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-SA 3.0 de

  • Share

Most Commented

May 9, 2023

1.

More Title IX Mischief

The Biden Education Department's Office for Civil Rights proposes a new rule on athletic eligibility favoring sexual confusion over female athletes....

April 14, 2023

2.

Faculty Fight for Academic Freedom at Harvard

While many faculty quietly endorse views they privately disagree with, Harvard faculty band together to resist administrative overreach, overzealous students, and protect academic freedom....

March 22, 2023

3.

NAS Statement on Ohio Higher Education Bill

The National Association of Scholars and the Civics Alliance enthusiastically endorse the introduction of Ohio Senate Bill 83 as it will depoliticize Ohio’s public higher educatio......

Most Read

April 7, 2023

1.

Congress Asks Dept of Education to Enforce Foreign Gift Disclosure Laws

The National Association of Scholars strongly endorses the Representatives' work to open the books on higher education's concealed dealings with the foreign despots who see......

May 15, 2015

2.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

April 14, 2023

3.

Faculty Fight for Academic Freedom at Harvard

While many faculty quietly endorse views they privately disagree with, Harvard faculty band together to resist administrative overreach, overzealous students, and protect academic freedom....