NAS Re-publishes "The Case for Colonialism"

In Support of Academic Freed

National Association of Scholars

NEW YORK, NY, June 13, 2018 – The National Association of Scholars (NAS) has re-published the most controversial academic article of the last few years, “The Case for Colonialism,” by Portland State University Bruce Gilley. A torrent of protest, including death threats, followed the initial publication of the article in Third World Quarterly in 2017.

The NAS has re-published “The Case for Colonialism” to ensure that it will be permanently available to students, scholars, and the general public.

Gilley’s article had undergone double-blind peer review before it was first published, but it aroused immediate fury. More than 16,000 people around the world petitioned to have the article censored. They also demanded that Third World Quarterly apologize and the editor be fired. Fifteen members of the journal’s thirty-four-member editorial board also resigned in objection to the article. Initially the publisher stood its ground, but after receiving serious threats of violence against the editor, the publisher withdrew the article. Gilley, the author, was also personally and professionally attacked and received death threats.

“The efforts to censor Bruce Gilley’s article and the attacks on him personally were outrageous,” said NAS President Peter Wood. “Gilley published a well-reasoned and humane perspective on the political and economic challenges that face many Third World nations. Anyone who actually reads the article will see his thoughtful tone and good will.”

“But we live in a time when many in the academic world believe they have the right to prevent the expression of views they disagree with,” Wood continued. “The actions of those who sought to suppress Gilley’s article demonstrate this. The intolerance and anti-intellectualism displayed in this instance reached a new extreme. The NAS is pleased to restore this important article to its legitimate place in academic debate.”

“The Case for Colonialism” is available to read on NAS.org and within the pages of the summer 2018 issue of our quarterly journal, Academic Questions

NAS is a network of scholars and citizens united by a commitment to academic freedom, disinterested scholarship, and excellence in American higher education. Membership in NAS is open to all who share a commitment to these broad principles. NAS publishes a journal and has state and regional affiliates. Visit NAS at www.nas.org.

###

If you would like more information about this issue, please call Chance Layton at 917-551-6770 or email [email protected]


Photo: By Bundesarchiv, Bild 105-DOA6369 / Walther Dobbertin / CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-SA 3.0 de

  • Share

Most Commented

October 25, 2022

1.

NAS President Peter Wood Addresses the Pending Racial Preferences Cases

Read NAS president Peter Wood's remarks on the upcoming Supreme Court cases, which he presented at a meeting of "Oasis," an informal group of academics and intellectuals based in......

July 25, 2022

2.

Against Transgenderism

The ideology of transgenderism strives to slam shut any door that offers opposition to its attempts to acquire power and control. This statement explains our opposition to such an ideology i......

October 20, 2022

3.

NAS Statement on Nomination of Ben Sasse for University of Florida President

We believe that Senator Sasse would make an excellent president of the University of Florida, and we urge the Board of Trustees to follow the search committee’s recommendation....

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

November 10, 2022

3.

Tracking Cancel Culture in Higher Education

UPDATED: A repository of 255 professors, administrators, and students who have been canceled for expressing views deemed unacceptable by higher education ideologues....