Scholars Join Brief to Supreme Court in Fisher v. University of Texas

  • Press_Release
  • October 21, 2011

PRINCETON, NJ (October 21, 2011)—The National Association of Scholars (NAS) has joined a friend-of-the-court brief asking the Supreme Court to revisit the diversity rationale for racial preferences in American college and university admissions. 

The plaintiff in the case is Abigail Fisher, who maintains that the University of Texas at Austin discriminated against her on the basis of race when it denied her admission.

The brief argues that the University of Texas’s race-based admissions policy violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and it urges the Court to reconsider the role of “diversity” in education.  The brief contends that colleges and universities should prioritize race-neutral alternatives over racial classifications, and it quotes as an authority NAS president Peter Wood’s book Diversity: The Invention of a Concept.

In January 2011, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld racial preferences, but one of the judges on the panel, Emilio M. Garza, wrote a 30-page “special concurrence” to accompany his decision. He wrote that although he felt that the 2003 decision in Grutter v. Bollinger bound him to decide as he did, he considered Grutter a “misstep” which only the Supreme Court could rectify. He wrote, “Yesterday’s racial discrimination was based on racial preference; today’s racial preference results in racial discrimination.” Garza’s opinion may have set up an opportunity for the Supreme Court to at least clarify, if not repeal race-based preferences.

NAS joins the Pacific Legal Foundation’s brief, which is also joined by the Center for Equal Opportunity (CEO), the American Civil Rights Institute (ACRI), and Project 21.

Stephen Balch, NAS chairman, said, “Preferences in our nation’s institutions of higher education tend to prolong racial prejudice, conflict, and achievement gaps. If we are ever to move into an era of human equality and justice, we must shed racial and ethnic preferences. Our rising generations will be better for it, and so will the quality of the education we give them. We urge the Supreme Court to recognize this.”

NAS works to improve American higher education by expanding intellectual standards, academic freedom, and institutional transparency in colleges and universities. To learn more about NAS, visit


Stephen Balch, NAS: 609-683-7878; [email protected]

  • Share

Most Commented

October 11, 2021


The Shame of MIT: Canceling Dorian Abbot

Professor Abbot was set to deliver MIT's prestigious Carlson Lecture—that is, until he was canceled for his views on DEI programs, earning him a prompt disinvitation....

October 5, 2021


NAS Statement on Gender Ideology in Higher Education

The National Association of Scholars opposes the proliferation of gender ideology in American higher education....

September 9, 2021


Winning the Cold Civil War

The threat from the illiberal left grows. How should we fight it?...

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 15, 2021


Tracking Cancel Culture in Higher Education

UPDATED: A repository of 194 professors, administrators, and students who have been canceled for expressing views deemed unacceptable by higher education ideologues....

May 26, 2010


10 Reasons Not to Go to College

A sampling of arguments for the idea that college may not be for everyone....