A Racially Restrictive Pipeline?

John Rosenberg

Under a headline proclaiming “Pipeline Into Partnerships Offers Minority Students A Chance,” USA Today describes a novel (for the time being) arrangement under which Southern Vermont College “outsourced much of the responsibility for choosing 17 members of its incoming freshman class to KIPP, the largest charter chain in the country, as well as to a high school in Brooklyn and the Boys and Girls Club of Schenectady, N.Y.”

Pipelines into Partnerships describes itself as “an initiative designed to further vulnerable student progression to and through college and to create a replicable and scalable model that can be deployed by a wide range of sending and destination partners.” Since USA Today reports that “all of the students in the Pipelines program” at Southern Vermont “come from minority families,” it’s not clear that this program can be “replicable” at public institutions that are constrained in their use of racially restrictive programs. Private colleges may be free (at least unless and until some future court decides that Title VI means what it says) to discriminate on the basis of race, but public institutions are not.

PiP and Kipp are certainly free, and should even be commended, for assisting “students whose current performance measures will not enable their entry into our elite colleges but who can and should graduate successfully from a four year college.” And Southern Vermont — or any college, public or private — are and should be free to “focus on unconventional measures of success, such as grit and academic improvement instead of just overall grades and scores….” If a college chooses, as Southern Vermont’s president Karen Gross was quoted in USA Today, to “shift the admissions paradigm, so that sending institutions play a vastly bigger role,” that is their prerogative.

What they should not — and public institutions do not — have is the freedom is anoint outside recruiters to round up minority students so that “their campus gets a diversity boost.” Displaying “grit and academic improvement,” after all, like all the “holistic” qualities admissions officers are fond of citing, is not limited to minorities.

This article originally appeared on Discriminations on September 16, 2011.

  • Share

Most Commented

August 17, 2021


Fermilab Concedes to Woke Physicists

Known for its powerful particle accelerator, Fermilab epitomizes American physics research. But after accusations of racism, a group of woke physicists now controls the lab....

July 7, 2021


CRT in Higher Education: Is a Day of Reckoning Coming for the University of Texas?

UT President Hartzell has been content to ignore critics regarding his institution's plunge into wokeism. With a Texas Legislature special session coming up, he may be in for a rude awak......

July 20, 2021


NAS Opposes the ABA’s Woke Standards for Law Schools

The American Bar Association would like the nation’s already-radicalized law schools to become even more so. We must step up and challenge this....

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 8, 2021


How Many Confucius Institutes Are in the United States?

UPDATED: We're keeping track of all Confucius Institutes in the United States, including those that remain open, those that closed, and those that have announced their closing....