CFER Defends Merit in UC Admissions

National Association of Scholars

The University of California (UC) Board of Regents has proposed a radical change to its admissions practices, one that would abolish all standardized testing requirements (SAT, ACT, etc.) and introduce a new admissions test created by the university system itself. This comes amidst claims from many that standardized tests such as the SAT reflect and help maintain racism and inequality in higher education admissions. Others deny this, arguing that the tests serve as equalizers and aid in creating a level playing field in admissions.

One group fighting the removal of standardized testing is Californians for Equal Rights (CFER), a non-profit organization that was pivotal in California’s rejection of Proposition 16 last November. In a letter to the UC Board of Regents, CFER’s executive director, Wenyuan Wu argues that “Dropping empirically designed tests in UC’s process of selecting incoming students is a politicized and misguided attempt to cover up true causes behind achievement and opportunity gaps.” She adds, “replacing academic selection with more subjective school-level factors (GPAs) will exacerbate the issue of “grade inflation” and deprive underrepresented students of their fair opportunities to succeed through hard work.”

Wu also testified before the Board of Regents on Thursday, a transcript of which may be found here. We also embed a recording of the testimony here:

The National Association of Scholars believes that standardized tests, despite their flaws, are necessary to help ensure that every applicant gets a fair shot at admission. Without them, it becomes far easier for wealthy applicants and others to pay their way into school through backdoor means. We commend Wenyuan Wu and CFER for their continual work in this arena and urge the University of California to keep, not drop, standardized testing.


Image: Louis H. G., Wikimedia CommonsCreative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

  • Share

Most Commented

November 24, 2021

1.

1619 Again: Revisiting the Project's Troubled Past

New York Times editor Jake Silverstein's new essay on the 1619 Project attempts to glide past the awkwardness that accompanied the project’s early days. Let's set the reco......

December 14, 2021

2.

Confronting Woke Groupthink in Art Education

The dubious notion that the U.S. is a “systemically racist” nation has taken hold in art education, as in virtually every sphere of American life....

January 18, 2022

3.

The White House Is Undermining Science, Not Defending It

Government support of scientific research is not designed to support science, but to harness science to political ends....

Most Read

January 18, 2022

1.

The White House Is Undermining Science, Not Defending It

Government support of scientific research is not designed to support science, but to harness science to political ends....

September 21, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What Does YHWH Elohim Mean?

A reader asks, "If Elohim refers to multiple 'gods,' then Yhwh Elohim really means Lord of Gods...the one of many, right?" A Hebrew expert answers....

January 12, 2022

3.

Press Release: NAS Appoints Dr. J. Scott Turner as Director of the Diversity in the Sciences Project

As project director, Dr. Turner will be conducting research on the scope and deleterious effects of DEI initiatives in STEM programs across the country....