Leaving Academia by Choice—A New Path for the Canceled?

David Acevedo

CounterCurrent: Week of 9/12

Sadly, cancel culture in higher education is old hat. “So another professor said something unpopular and got fired,” you may be thinking. “So what?” It’s easy to feel jaded by the seemingly incessant barrage of cancellation stories—I track them closely and can certainly relate to the sentiment. Though we should never allow ourselves to grow comfortable with academic cancel culture as a “new normal.”

Cancel culture may have become a “norm,” in the sense that it is nearly ubiquitous, but it is still an ugly stain upon the academy, not an inherent feature of the academy itself. Our universities are straying from education, but they are not redefining education. They simply don’t have the power or authority to do that. What they do has no effect on the liberal educational ideal that has shaped Western civilization for millennia.

All of this said, how ought we respond? Many academics still hold out hope that our current higher education establishment can be reformed from within. If we just dig in our heels and continue teaching in a principled, disinterested manner, something might change. Others are not so optimistic, but still choose to remain in academia in order to pursue their research the best they can, put food on the table, and give their students some semblance of a real education. If 1 out of the 40 professors they have during their studies is a real educator, that must be better than 0, right?

There are a few who belong to a separate category altogether: those who have been canceled, who have weathered the backlash and kept their jobs, but who ultimately decide to resign by choice. The latest example of this relatively rare scenario comes from Dr. Peter Boghossian, who quit his job at Portland State University last Wednesday.

Dr. Boghossian was an assistant professor of philosophy at PSU for about ten years. In that time, he earned a reputation as a dynamic educator willing to engage with many ideological opponents. He also got into more than his fair share of trouble. He—along with frequent collaborator James Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose—was behind the infamous grievance studies affair, in which the three authors wrote a series of satirical academic articles loaded with postmodern jargon, some of which were accepted by peer-reviewed journals. So Boghossian was a bit of a troublemaker, to be sure, but I’d argue that it was the right kind of trouble. He earned plenty of scorn, but at the end of the day kept his job and continued teaching.

So why the sudden change of heart? As Boghossian details in his open letter to PSU administration published on Bari Weiss’ Common Sense blog, he came to believe that 1) PSU is basically a lost cause and 2) his position was simply not worth the constant ridicule and harassment he endured day in and day out. PSU has abandoned true education and Boghossian was increasingly hated by his colleagues and students—why stay?

Portland State University has failed in fulfilling this duty. In doing so it has failed not only its students but the public that supports it. While I am grateful for the opportunity to have taught at Portland State for over a decade, it has become clear to me that this institution is no place for people who intend to think freely and explore ideas.

This is not the outcome I wanted. But I feel morally obligated to make this choice. For ten years, I have taught my students the importance of living by your principles. One of mine is to defend our system of liberal education from those who seek to destroy it. Who would I be if I didn’t?

I commend Dr. Boghossian for his brave decision and lament that he felt forced to make it. Abuse must end at some point; thankfully, Boghossian may move on to a place less acrimonious toward liberal education. This very well may become a new form of cancel culture fallout. Administrators won’t even have to discipline or fire their heterodox professors—they’ll simply make or endorse conditions so intolerable that their canceled faculty leave by choice.

CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, written by Communications & Research Associate David Acevedo. To subscribe, update your email preferences here.

Image: Visitor7, Wikimedia CommonsCreative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, cropped.

  • Share

Most Commented

August 17, 2021


Fermilab Concedes to Woke Physicists

Known for its powerful particle accelerator, Fermilab epitomizes American physics research. But after accusations of racism, a group of woke physicists now controls the lab....

July 7, 2021


CRT in Higher Education: Is a Day of Reckoning Coming for the University of Texas?

UT President Hartzell has been content to ignore critics regarding his institution's plunge into wokeism. With a Texas Legislature special session coming up, he may be in for a rude awak......

July 20, 2021


NAS Opposes the ABA’s Woke Standards for Law Schools

The American Bar Association would like the nation’s already-radicalized law schools to become even more so. We must step up and challenge this....

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 8, 2021


How Many Confucius Institutes Are in the United States?

UPDATED: We're keeping track of all Confucius Institutes in the United States, including those that remain open, those that closed, and those that have announced their closing....