Shopping Spree

Peter Wood

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act includes $44 billion for education to be spent in the 30 to 45 days following February 17, when President Obama signed the law.   Other funds kick in a little later, $17.3 billion for Pell Grants and work-study for next academic year, and $35 billion for Title I, IDEA, and State Fiscal Stabilization Funds to be spent between July 1 and September 30. 

Higher education has to share some of this windfall with lower education, but it appears that colleges and universities get between $50 and $75 billion all told.   It is hard to tell the exact amount because the “state stabilization” fund lets the states decide how to divide some of the money between public colleges and universities and elementary and secondary schools.  Some of the money is allotted for specific purposes—more or less.  The National Institutes of Health got an additional $8.5 billion for biomedical research and $1.5 billion to renovate university research facilities. 

But it seems safe to assume that with an urgent need to spend $44 billion by the end of this month, the Department of Education will soon be willing to take a “no reasonable offer refused” approach towards requests for funds from those of us in the academic world.

One correspondent tells us what she plans to do with her share of the $44 billion:

First I'm going to buy my own college.  Then hire all my current administrative colleagues.  And then make them do project A, then scratch that and make them do the opposite, then scratch that and make them do project A again, but better.  Then scratch that and do the opposite, then A, then its opposite, A, its opposite, A, its opposite, A, opposite, A, opposite.  Until they or pick one another off or spontaneously combust.

In other words, this would establish the academic equivalent of a government-designated “bad bank,” in which non-performing loans and toxic assets are segregated from the financial system as a whole.  The “bad college” approach would divert toxic college administrators into a realm where they could do no further harm.

We’re not sure this is the most constructive use of public funds, though it is far from the worst of proposals currently under consideration.  

The proposal also makes us wonder what our well-placed readers intend to do with their shares of $44 billion.   Time is running out.  How will you spend your part? 

  • Share

Most Commented

December 7, 2022


New Study Tracks Rise of DEI in STEM Departments, Associations, Grants, and Literature

A new study published today by the National Association of Scholars, Ideological Intensification, offers an in-depth quantitative analysis of just how far DEI has advanced into STEM fields....

January 9, 2023


NAS Celebrates the Nomination of Reform-Minded Trustees to the New College of Florida Board

The National Association of Scholars is delighted with Governor Ron DeSantis’ nomination of six education reformers to the Board of Trustees of the New College of Florida....

October 20, 2022


NAS Statement on Nomination of Ben Sasse for University of Florida President

We believe that Senator Sasse would make an excellent president of the University of Florida, and we urge the Board of Trustees to follow the search committee’s recommendation....

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 19, 2022


How Many Confucius Institutes Are in the United States?

UPDATED: We're keeping track of all Confucius Institutes in the United States, including those that remain open, those that closed, and those that have announced their closing....