The NAS Commends South Dakota's Commitment to Intellectual Diversity

National Association of Scholars

South Dakota recently passed HB 1087, a bill requiring intellectual diversity in public universities. The National Association of Scholars has supported this effort and testified about ways to put this bill into practice. One part of our recommendation was that South Dakota's Board of Regents should work to reduce as much as possible the size of the diversity bureaucracies. Board of Regents President Kevin V. Schieffer now writes that the Board plans a more modest initial reform: to scrutinize diversity bureaucracies for "extreme ideological agendas," but to leave them in place. The NAS believes more thorough measures to restrict the size and powers of diversity bureaucracies are necessary, but we welcome President Schieffer's decision. The NAS congratulates both him and the Board of Regents as a whole.

Below is the letter NAS President Peter Wood has written to President Schieffer.

PDF of the letter


July 23, 2019

Kevin V. Schieffer
President
South Dakota Board of Regents
306 E. Capital Ave, Ste. 200
Pierre, SD 57501

Dear President Schieffer,

I write to express the National Association of Scholars’ support for your decision “to ensure that existing university diversity centers are balanced and focused on promoting and enhancing cultural diversity, and that they are not pushing excess liberal or extreme ideological agendas.” (“Schieffer: Intellectual diversity — moving SD universities forward,” Aberdeen News, July 17, 2019.)

The NAS stands staunchly against the politicization of the academy, and we applaud your work to do the same. Diversity bureaucracies nationwide, including in South Dakota, are deeply rooted in extreme ideological agendas, as NAS has documented for well over a decade. Yet the NAS supports attempts to reform diversity bureaucracies. If they prove successful, we are glad to learn from what works. While we will continue to press for more thoroughgoing actions against diversity bureaucracies nationwide, and in South Dakota, we welcome your initial action and wish you all success in the endeavor. If we can be of any assistance, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

Yours sincerely,

Peter W. Wood
President
National Association of Scholars

  • Share

Most Commented

July 16, 2020

1.

An Emeritus Professor Under Siege Once Again

The case of Stuart Hurlbert is a grim reminder that not even emeritus professors are safe from the continual onslaught of heterodox views by higher ed censors....

July 28, 2020

2.

Exclusive: UT Austin Proposes Political Litmus Tests for Hiring and Promotion

The University of Texas at Austin has proposed the “Faculty Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, Strategic Plan," exchanging merit-based success for identity-based dive...

May 15, 2015

3.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

September 10, 2020

2.

College Board Corrupted by Chinese Government Funding, Report Finds

In exchange for generous Chinese government funding, the College Board has given China strategic access to American K-12 education, concludes a new report from the National Association of Sc...

September 8, 2020

3.

How Many Confucius Institutes Are in the United States?

UPDATED: We're keeping track of all Confucius Institutes in the United States, including those that remain open, those that closed, and those that have announced their closing....