U.S. Representatives Fight Back Against CRT and Action Civics

David Randall

United States representatives have just introduced a resolution and two bills, each of which seeks to restrict critical race theory, action civics, or both.

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Critical Race Theory serves as a prejudicial ideological tool (House Bill 397) condemns Critical Race Theory and states that it should not be taught in K-12 classrooms. House Bill 397 explicitly mentions that “Critical Race Theory often advocates for ‘action civics’, which in some school districts has resulted in students being taught how to engage in disruptive protests without as much concern for teaching the fundamentals of how government works and why.”

To amend title III (House Bill 3137) prohibits the expenditure of funds on the Proposed Rule submitted by the Department of Education, a set of rules that, if approved, would cement radically racist instruction into the nation’s American History and Civics Education.

To amend section 8526A (House Bill 3157) prohibits federal mandates, direction, or control with respect to American history and civics education, and for other purposes.

We cannot comment in detail on the two bills, since their authors have not yet released the bills’ text. We are cautious in particular about House Bill 3157, since we do not want absolutely to exclude the possibility of federal legislation to support proper civics education. We reserve the right to critique these bills in detail, when the texts appear.

We are also aware that the resolution and two bills are unlikely to pass the current House, to receive the support of the Senate, or to survive a presidential veto. These are expressions of support for traditional civics education, which lay down markers for future legislation in changed political circumstances.

These stipulations acknowledged, the National Association of Scholars enthusiastically commends the House Representatives who have introduced the resolution and two bills—especially the primary sponsors, Representative Burgess Owens, Representative David Cawthorn, and Representative Greg Murphy. The cause of civics education is vital to the survival of the republic—for if our children do not learn why their country deserves their love, they will never bother to preserve it. These representatives deserve our thanks—and the thanks of all American citizens.

We encourage all Americans to contact these Representatives to express their gratitude for their efforts. We provide their contact information below.

*

SPONSORS

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Critical Race Theory serves as a prejudicial ideological tool (House Bill 397)

Representative Burgess Owens [Primary Sponsor]

Representative Rick Allen

Representative Brian Babin

Representative Jim Banks

Representative Dan Bishop

Representative Lauren Boebert

Representative Mo Brooks

Representative Ken Buck

Representative Ken Calvert

Representative David Cawthorn

Representative Michael Cloud

Representative Byron Donalds

Representative Robert Good

Representative Patrick Fallon

Representative Glenn Grothman

Representative Diana Harshbarger

Representative Andy Harris

Representative Darrell Issa

Representative Ronny Jackson

Representative Christopher Jacobs

Representative John Joyce

Representative Mike Kelly

Representative Brian Mast

Representative John Moolenaar

Representative Scott Perry

Representative Guy Reschenthaler

Representative Tom Rice

Representative David Rouzer

Representative Chip Roy

Representative Austin Scott

Representative Chris Stewart

Representative Tom Tiffany

Representative Joe Wilson

To amend title III (House Bill 3137)

Representative David Cawthorn [Primary Sponsor]

Representative Dan Bishop

Representative Virginia Foxx

Representative Glenn Grothman

Representative Patrick McHenry

To amend section 8526A (House Bill 3157)

Representative Greg Murphy [Primary Sponsor]

Representative Rick Allen

Representative David Cawthorn

Representative Virginia Foxx

Representative Glenn Grothman


David Randall is Director of Research at the National Association of Scholars and Project Director of the Civics Alliance.

Images: House Creative Committee, Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain

  • Share

Most Commented

February 13, 2024

1.

The Great Academic Divorce with China

All signs show that American education is beginning a long and painful divorce with the People’s Republic of China. But will academia go through with it?...

January 24, 2024

2.

After Claudine

The idea has caught on that the radical left overplayed its hand in DEI and is now vulnerable to those of us who seek major reforms. This is not, however, the first time that the a......

February 2, 2024

3.

Tribalism or Individualism?

The most immediate work of conservatives must be the rejection of tribalism and a refocus on the individual—individual character, industry, and aptitude....

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 21, 2010

3.

Ask a Scholar: What Does YHWH Elohim Mean?

A reader asks, "If Elohim refers to multiple 'gods,' then Yhwh Elohim really means Lord of Gods...the one of many, right?" A Hebrew expert answers....