Academic Unions: Join or Say, 'Goodbye to Your Career'

National Association of Scholars

NEW YORK, NY, January 29, 2019 - The National Association of Scholars (NAS) has filed an amicus brief supporting St. Cloud State University Political Science Professor Kathleen Uradnik’s petition for appeal in her fight to secure her constitutionally protected rights to freedom of speech and association. The petition was filed with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals after Minnesota Federal District Court Judge Paul A. Magnuson denied the motion for preliminary injunction in the case of Uradnik v. Inter Faculty Organization, et al.

Professor Uradnik’s petition to the Eighth Circuit argues that forcing her to pay union dues violates her First Amendment rights. NAS is represented in its amicus brief by William Jonathan Haun.

“The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling last year in Janus v. AFSCME Council 31 secured the rights of nonunion workers not to be forced to pay union dues,” said Peter W. Wood, president of NAS. “But the ruling left open several widespread abuses, including the power of faculty unions to trample the rights of individual faculty members to speak for themselves. Some unions enjoy the ability to represent their opinions as the exclusive views of all faculty members, including those who don’t even belong to the union. This is wrong,” said Dr. Wood.

While NAS takes no position on whether college and university faculty should unionize, it draws a sharp distinction between collective bargaining and ideological advocacy. Dr. Wood said, “When faculty unions declare their support for one side of a contentious political or philosophical debate, and represent this view as the collective wisdom of the whole faculty, they force those faculty members who hold different views to conform. This is what the courts call ‘compelled speech,’ and it violates both academic freedom and the spirit of the First Amendment.”

Peter W. Wood continued, “The National Association of Scholars is opposed to any union strong-arming non-members into ideological conformity by exclusive representation. The political activity of unions is often the very reason professors do not join in the first place. Furthermore, NAS finds that reserving administrative and faculty appointments to union members improperly restricts the role of individual faculty in university governance. Protecting First Amendment rights and ending faculty unions’ assertion of exclusive representation is necessary for a free academy respectful of ideological diversity and inclusion.”

  • Share

Most Commented

October 25, 2022

1.

NAS President Peter Wood Addresses the Pending Racial Preferences Cases

Read NAS president Peter Wood's remarks on the upcoming Supreme Court cases, which he presented at a meeting of "Oasis," an informal group of academics and intellectuals based in......

July 25, 2022

2.

Against Transgenderism

The ideology of transgenderism strives to slam shut any door that offers opposition to its attempts to acquire power and control. This statement explains our opposition to such an ideology i......

October 20, 2022

3.

NAS Statement on Nomination of Ben Sasse for University of Florida President

We believe that Senator Sasse would make an excellent president of the University of Florida, and we urge the Board of Trustees to follow the search committee’s recommendation....

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

May 12, 2017

3.

Harvard Prepares to Host All Black Graduation

Is Harvard's all black graduation a benign trend or a step backwards? ...