California Votes to Keep Ban on Race and Sex Discrimination

National Association of Scholars

New York, NY, November 4th, 2020: Proposition 16, which would repeal a constitutional provision that made it unlawful for California's state and local governments to discriminate against or grant preferential treatment to people based on race, ethnicity, national origin, or sex, has failed. The vote follows numerous attempts by special interest groups to re-institute race and sex discrimination in California and overturn Proposition 209, which banned such prejudice.

Proposition 16 was added as a ballot initiative to the 2020 election after the Democratic-controlled California legislature rushed a bill through both chambers during the first months of a global pandemic. Had it passed, Prop. 16 would have allowed for colleges and universities to discriminate based on race and sex. 

“The people of California have once again shown that they are nowhere near as biased and fanatical as their local leaders,” said National Association of Scholars (NAS) president Peter Wood. “Almost twenty-five years ago the people of California said ‘no’ to discrimination and they’ve said it again today.”

In 1996, Ward Connerly and the California Association of Scholars fought to get Prop. 209 on the ballot. That initiative was supported by a majority of Californians, who made Prop. 209’s anti-discrimination language a part of their California Consititution. 

In the lead-up to election day, Quinn M. Delaney, the Kaiser Foundation, the California Teachers Association, California Community Colleges, the University of California, and Gov. Gavin Newsome formed a pro-discrimination alliance that accumlated a warchest of nearly $31 million. Meanwhile, Proposition 16’s opponents raised nearly $1.6 million to fund their efforts to keep the anti-discimination Prop. 209 in place.

Dr. Wood continued: “NAS’s own Ward Connerly and Gail Heriot are but two faces in a large sea that fought to ensure Californians of all races and both sexes have equal standing before admissions offices and state contract offices. Their efforts are celebrated by NAS and continue our organization’s legacy of ensuring equal access to education.”


For more information on this topic, please contact Chance Layton at [email protected] or at 917-551-6770.

Photo by Jorge Fernández Salas on Unsplash

  • Share

Most Commented

October 25, 2022


NAS President Peter Wood Addresses the Pending Racial Preferences Cases

Read NAS president Peter Wood's remarks on the upcoming Supreme Court cases, which he presented at a meeting of "Oasis," an informal group of academics and intellectuals based in......

July 25, 2022


Against Transgenderism

The ideology of transgenderism strives to slam shut any door that offers opposition to its attempts to acquire power and control. This statement explains our opposition to such an ideology i......

October 20, 2022


NAS Statement on Nomination of Ben Sasse for University of Florida President

We believe that Senator Sasse would make an excellent president of the University of Florida, and we urge the Board of Trustees to follow the search committee’s recommendation....

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

May 12, 2017


Harvard Prepares to Host All Black Graduation

Is Harvard's all black graduation a benign trend or a step backwards? ...