New Hampshire Passes Law Banning Racial Preferences

PRINCETON, NJ (January 5, 2012)—New Hampshire has passed a law prohibiting the use of racial and ethnic preferences in the public sector. The National Association of Scholars (NAS) hailed the measure as a new victory for equal opportunity on the basis of merit in higher education. 

Other states have approved similar bans through ballot initiatives endorsed by voters. California’s Proposition 209 was the first in 1996. Washington (1998), Nebraska (2008), and Arizona (2010) followed suit, and the 1999 “One Florida Plan” is a partial ban of racial preferences in that state. The law approved by Michigan voters in 2006 remains in force pending a decision by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.
New Hampshire thus joins a growing cohort of states that have made decisions to oppose racial and ethnic discrimination.
“We at the National Association of Scholars congratulate the New Hampshire legislators for their contribution to true social justice,” said Peter Wood, president of the NAS. “We are glad to see states taking steps in the right direction. No person should be prejudged by race or ethnicity, and to do so harms the integrity of our nation’s institutions such as higher education. New Hampshire has chosen instead to uphold individual merit and equal opportunity.”
Ward Connerly, president of the American Civil Rights Initiative and member of the NAS board of directors, added, "It is exceptionally difficult to eliminate certain policies once they become embedded in the national culture. Yet that is precisely what is happening with regard to race preferences.”
Connerly continued, “With major help from NAS, roughly one quarter of the American people now reside in a state where race preferences are forbidden, totally or partially: Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire and Washington. Such an accomplishment was unthinkable a few short years ago. While there is much work to be done, the end of race-based preferences can now be foreseen and the achievement of an academic meritocracy can be realized."
The next racial preferences ballot initiative will go to a vote in Oklahoma in fall 2012.
NAS works to improve American higher education by expanding intellectual standards, academic freedom, and institutional transparency in colleges and universities. To learn more about NAS, visit
CONTACT: Peter Wood, President, NAS: 609-683-7878[email protected]
  • Share

Most Commented

May 18, 2023


Letter: In Defense of Professor Scott Gerber

The Ohio Northern University’s senior administrators have treated Professor Scott Gerber appallingly by removing him from campus without due cause—a clear abuse of......

May 9, 2023


More Title IX Mischief

The Biden Education Department's Office for Civil Rights proposes a new rule on athletic eligibility favoring sexual confusion over female athletes....

May 23, 2023


Academic Freedom Isn’t Free

If higher education cannot hold itself to its founding principles, then we must....

Most Read

April 7, 2023


Congress Asks Dept of Education to Enforce Foreign Gift Disclosure Laws

The National Association of Scholars strongly endorses the Representatives' work to open the books on higher education's concealed dealings with the foreign despots who see......

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

April 14, 2023


Faculty Fight for Academic Freedom at Harvard

While many faculty quietly endorse views they privately disagree with, Harvard faculty band together to resist administrative overreach, overzealous students, and protect academic freedom....