New Hampshire Passes Law Banning Racial Preferences

PRINCETON, NJ (January 5, 2012)—New Hampshire has passed a law prohibiting the use of racial and ethnic preferences in the public sector. The National Association of Scholars (NAS) hailed the measure as a new victory for equal opportunity on the basis of merit in higher education. 

Other states have approved similar bans through ballot initiatives endorsed by voters. California’s Proposition 209 was the first in 1996. Washington (1998), Nebraska (2008), and Arizona (2010) followed suit, and the 1999 “One Florida Plan” is a partial ban of racial preferences in that state. The law approved by Michigan voters in 2006 remains in force pending a decision by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.
New Hampshire thus joins a growing cohort of states that have made decisions to oppose racial and ethnic discrimination.
“We at the National Association of Scholars congratulate the New Hampshire legislators for their contribution to true social justice,” said Peter Wood, president of the NAS. “We are glad to see states taking steps in the right direction. No person should be prejudged by race or ethnicity, and to do so harms the integrity of our nation’s institutions such as higher education. New Hampshire has chosen instead to uphold individual merit and equal opportunity.”
Ward Connerly, president of the American Civil Rights Initiative and member of the NAS board of directors, added, "It is exceptionally difficult to eliminate certain policies once they become embedded in the national culture. Yet that is precisely what is happening with regard to race preferences.”
Connerly continued, “With major help from NAS, roughly one quarter of the American people now reside in a state where race preferences are forbidden, totally or partially: Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire and Washington. Such an accomplishment was unthinkable a few short years ago. While there is much work to be done, the end of race-based preferences can now be foreseen and the achievement of an academic meritocracy can be realized."
The next racial preferences ballot initiative will go to a vote in Oklahoma in fall 2012.
NAS works to improve American higher education by expanding intellectual standards, academic freedom, and institutional transparency in colleges and universities. To learn more about NAS, visit
CONTACT: Peter Wood, President, NAS: 609-683-7878[email protected]
  • Share

Most Commented

May 7, 2024


Creating Students, Not Activists

The mobs desecrating the American flag, smashing windows, chanting genocidal slogans—this always was the end game of the advocates of the right to protest, action civics, student activ......

March 9, 2024


A Portrait of Claireve Grandjouan

Claireve Grandjouan, when I knew her, was Head of the Classics Department at Hunter College, and that year gave a three-hour Friday evening class in Egyptian archaeology....

April 20, 2024


The Academic's Roadmap

By all means, pursue your noble dream of improving the condition of humanity through your research and teaching. Could I do it all again, I would, but I would do things very differently....

Most Read

May 15, 2015


Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 21, 2010


Ask a Scholar: What Does YHWH Elohim Mean?

A reader asks, "If Elohim refers to multiple 'gods,' then Yhwh Elohim really means Lord of Gods...the one of many, right?" A Hebrew expert answers....